Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Question for the boxing purist!!!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Spray_resistant View Post
    I would go with the Floyd win because both Floyd and B-hop were underdogs against unbeaten opponents known for their ko power but Chico at least went on to still have some meaningful wins and after the B-hop loss Tito really didn't.
    That's because Bhop ruined him, which makes it even more impressive.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Light_Speed View Post
      That's because Bhop ruined him, which makes it even more impressive.
      Floyd's win was an utter destruction, it was far more impressive.

      Comment


      • #33
        Anybody who fight B-Hop, career goes down the drain. Latest victim Bad Chad Dawson

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Light_Speed View Post
          That's because Bhop ruined him, which makes it even more impressive.
          Anybody who fight B-Hop, career goes down the drain. Latest victim Bad Chad Dawson

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by FRANKGWJ View Post
            Anybody who fight B-Hop, career goes down the drain. Latest victim Bad Chad Dawson
            Yup B-Hop is the soul taker.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Light_Speed View Post
              Yup B-Hop is the soul taker.
              They don't call him the executioner for nothing!!!

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Spray_resistant View Post
                Floyd's win was an utter destruction, it was far more impressive.
                Sure, comparing the performances themselves, one might think Floyd's victory was more impressive due to the knock downs. But let's compare the opponents they were both facing.

                Tito > Chico
                Last edited by _original_; 10-05-2012, 10:12 PM.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by FRANKGWJ View Post
                  Which was the greater preformance?
                  Mayweather vs Corrales
                  Hopkins vs Trinidad

                  We're at the Barber Shop having this huge debate on these two matches and about 75% of 30 people in here chose Hopkins because of hit age and he was a huge underdog!!!
                  I'd say Hopkins because Tito was a better fighter than Chico and Tito let loose the whole kitchen sink in 6 and 10 and couldn't do anything. Mayweather was dazzling but given court issues and weight issues going in, there was at least a slim question of whether he could have done a little better. I think Tito fought as well as he could and still couldn't do anything because Hopkins was having the night of his life.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by crold1 View Post
                    I'd say Hopkins because Tito was a better fighter than Chico and Tito let loose the whole kitchen sink in 6 and 10 and couldn't do anything. Mayweather was dazzling but given court issues and weight issues going in, there was at least a slim question of whether he could have done a little better. I think Tito fought as well as he could and still couldn't do anything because Hopkins was having the night of his life.
                    Can you say killer feints!!! B-Hop did what he wanted to do all night long and there was nothing Tito could do about it!!!

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Mayweather-Corrales.

                      Hopkins beating Trinidad was huge, a great win. But Trinidad was best at WW, by far.

                      Corrales was the man at 130, and many thought Floyd would lose too. And Floyd gave one of the most dominant beatdowns between two Top 10 P4P fighters in recent memory.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP