the ONLY way for floyd to catch up to pacquiao historically is to beat spence or Bud

[hugh grant]

also..... Mayweather would have beaten Thurman today, yesterday, and tomorrow..... all at once

The story of floyds career. Wouldve beat Thurman, could've beat Thurman but didn't. Pac actually beat Thurman at 41, whilst Floyd only coulda if he wanted to.
Pacs win over Thurman is better than anything on floyds resume. Better than floyds win over Pac who had been koed by JMM. Thurman was unbeaten champion, just like Floyd was. Just because Pac has a better resume than Thurman, doesn't mean Floyds win over Pac is better, it don't work like that. But in floyds fans simple minds it does, they don't understand context and im sure some boxing experts don't also.
Cautious Floyd wouldn't ever fight Thurman at 41, he wouldn't do it at 36 and had every excuse under sun not to go there.
Pacs win is better than anything on FLoyds resume. The majority of Boxing experts know that and any boxing expert who don't realize that aren't experts. Anyone who understands the word context know that. Thurman looked average against Lopez but he didn't against Pac as Thurman was a different man against Pac, whilst Nelo was average anyway at the time Floyd fought him looking bad average against trout because Nelo was nothing special back then.

[KillaMane26]

jmm jumped up 2 divisions AND got cheated on the scales. that fight was a joke before round 1 started. ZERO credit

and shane spent more than a year out the ring after beating Margarito and had an entire camp preparing for berto ruined due to the earthquake in haiti. shane was obviously over trained and washed up in may 2010.

And Thurman was out almost 2 years and almost got stopped in his return fight....Dont be a fanboy
KEEP THAT SAME ENERGY

[aboutfkntime]

The story of floyds career. Wouldve beat Thurman, could've beat Thurman but didn't. Pac actually beat Thurman at 41, whilst Floyd only coulda if he wanted to.

..... but, he didn't beat Floyd

Pacs win over Thurman is better than anything on floyds resume. Better than floyds win over Pac who had been koed by JMM. Thurman was unbeaten champion, just like Floyd was. Just because Pac has a better resume than Thurman, doesn't mean Floyds win over Pac is better, it don't work like that. But in floyds fans simple minds it does, they don't understand context and im sure some boxing experts don't also.
Cautious Floyd wouldn't ever fight Thurman at 41, he wouldn't do it at 36 and had every excuse under sun not to go there.
Pacs win is better than anything on FLoyds resume. The majority of Boxing experts know that and any boxing expert who don't realize that aren't experts. Anyone who understands the word context know that. Thurman looked average against Lopez but he didn't against Pac as Thurman was a different man against Pac, whilst Nelo was average anyway at the time Floyd fought him looking bad average against trout because Nelo was nothing special back then.

stoppit, that is NONSENSE

if Pac read that..... he would be like, wtf?

stop being ridiculous

Mayweather beating Pacquiao when he was 38, is MUCH better than Pacquiao beating Thurman when he was 40

Thurman's best win is scraping past Porter..... Pacquiao is MUCH better than Thurman

silly fl0mo

[hugh grant]

Pac s win over thurman is historically better than anything on floyds resume.
What Pac did no WW in history has done.

If anyone dreamed it might happen oneday, nobody would have predicted a former flyweight with 71 fights under belt and 23 years in sport in.doing it.
Again Pac s win over thurman is better than anything historically than in floydsvresume
Ray Charles and Stevie wonder can see that. Floyd fans pretend they cant but youd expect that from Floyd fans. Its a good thing Floyd fans pretend to not see it, because if they admitted it people would probably die of shock.

[Real King Kong]

there was certainly nothing to gain from your last post.....





it was just whiney nonsense

tell us who you think is the greatest..... ?

so that we can see how you roll..... and so that we can see what really motivated you to write that pointless post

It doesn’t matter at all. Tell me one good reason why it matters who thinks which guy is “greater”? Lol

[HandsofIron]

Mayweather vs Spence in Sept, why not?

Give the young blood a chance to show what they're made of like Pac did with Thurman.

[aboutfkntime]

Pac s win over thurman is historically better than anything on floyds resume.
What Pac did no WW in history has done.

If anyone dreamed it might happen oneday, nobody would have predicted a former flyweight with 71 fights under belt and 23 years in sport in.doing it.
Again Pac s win over thurman is better than anything historically than in floydsvresume
Ray Charles and Stevie wonder can see that. Floyd fans pretend they cant but youd expect that from Floyd fans. Its a good thing Floyd fans pretend to not see it, because if they admitted it people would probably die of shock.

you are being utterly ridiculous Hugh

Mayweather beating Pacquiao when he was 38, is MUCH better than Pacquiao beating Thurman when he was 40

Mayweather beating Canelo when he was 36, is MUCH better than Pacquiao beating Thurman when he was 40

Pac would put you on ignore for typing such sillyness