The winner of Thurman and Pacquiao should not fight Spence/Crawford

[D4thincarnation]

When did manny take tough fight after tough fight? You are severely over exaggerating Manny’s career progression to try and make this thread valid.

Manny isn’t a real champion. He is fighting Thurman because he is essentially his mando. Once they settle who is the WBA champ, it is only natural that the winner fight another champion next.

Imo the winner of manny/Thurman should fight Crawford and then the winner of Spence/porter after so we have a unification fight between 2 multiple belt champions. That will establish not only a unified champ but a lineal one as well.

So you don't want Spence to fight Crawford next?

[D4thincarnation]

Stop playing stupid you know why both fights aren’t happening. And when spence beats porter he’ll have 2 belts and will still be the best fight for Thurman it manny

So tell us why isn't it happening?

[The Big Dunn]

So you don't want Spence to fight Crawford next?

Has nothing to do with that. Spence/ porter is a unification between #1 and #4 wws . solid fight that moves the division forward. Manny/ Thurman winner v Crawford is the #2 and #3 Wws fighting. Also moves the division forward.

Nothing wrong with good solid fights between the best in the division before the winners fight.

[Super_Lightweight]

There aren't that many tough fights at 147 to be had by Spence. That's a big reason why he fought Garcia in the first place. Let Spence fight an old Pacquiao and get beat. Pacquiao goes down as a top 5 fighter of all time.

[D4thincarnation]

Has nothing to do with that. Spence/ porter is a unification between #1 and #4 wws . solid fight that moves the division forward. Manny/ Thurman winner v Crawford is the #2 and #3 Wws fighting. Also moves the division forward.

Nothing wrong with good solid fights between the best in the division before the winners fight.

Porter has already been beat, picked up Thurman's vacant title after Thruman has already beat him.

Spence needs to fight Crawford instead of Thruman's leftovers.

Then the winner can fight the Pacquiao Thurman winner.


Crawford has beat nobody of note at welter.

And Spence only got Brook on his record.

Amazing that you don't want Spence to fight Crawford.

[The Big Dunn]

Porter has already been beat, picked up Thurman's vacant title after Thruman has already beat him.

Spence needs to fight Crawford instead of Thruman's leftovers.

Then the winner can fight the Pacquiao Thurman winner.


Crawford has beat nobody of note at welter.

And Spence only got Brook on his record.

Amazing that you don't want Spence to fight Crawford.

Again has nothing to do with that. If Crawford has beat no one of note as you said then he should earn a shot at the #1 ww by beating the winner of Thurman/manny.

You are being gay as usual. On the one hand you claim Crawford has fought no one. On the other you say he should get the #1 ww next despite that fact. In no other weight class would you argue for a fight between the top guy and someone you claimed “beat no one”.

You should want Spence to fight porter next because in your opinion
he, unlike Crawford , has beat someone.

[D4thincarnation]

Again has nothing to do with that. If Crawford has beat no one of note as you said then he should earn a shot at the #1 ww by beating the winner of Thurman/manny.

You are being gay as usual. On the one hand you claim Crawford has fought no one. On the other you say he should get the #1 ww next despite that fact. In no other weight class would you argue for a fight between the top guy and someone you claimed “beat no one”.

You should want Spence to fight porter next because in your opinion
he, unlike Crawford , has beat someone.

He has also lost to Thurman and only has a paper title.


Do you want Crawford to fight Spence this year?
Just for the record.

[The Big Dunn]

He has also lost to Thurman and only has a paper title.


Do you want Crawford to fight Spence this year?
Just for the record.

So what if he lost to Thurman in the past. We are talking now.

If Crawford according to you hasn’t beaten anyone, then he shouldn’t be fighting the top ww next . The fight should go to the guys that have beaten someone. Yet you contradict yourself by calling for the fight and arguing with anyone that doesn’t agree with you.

You have to explain why you are calling for a Spence/ Crawford fight next when you think porter, Thurman ad manny all have a better case and are more deserving of the fight next since they beat someone of substance while Crawford has not.

You are not making sense with your argument.

[D4thincarnation]

So what if he lost to Thurman in the past. We are talking now.

If Crawford according to you hasn’t beaten anyone, then he shouldn’t be fighting the top ww next . The fight should go to the guys that have beaten someone. Yet you contradict yourself by calling for the fight and arguing with anyone that doesn’t agree with you.

You have to explain why you are calling for a Spence/ Crawford fight next when you think porter, Thurman ad manny all have a better case and are more deserving of the fight next since they beat someone of substance while Crawford has not.

You are not making sense with your argument.

Because he is done from this equation.

And yes Crawford should not be fighting the best in the division which is Thurman, and will be the winner of Thurman vs Pacquiao.

He should be fighting Spence just another title holder.


Again, Do you want to see Spence fight Crawford this year?

Simple question yet for some reason you don't want to answer it.

[KillaMane26]

I agree to a certain extent when it comes to Crawford. Spence on the other hand called out these dudes and they aint wanna fight. U see how Porter tried to fight Thurman instead of Spence lol.

But Crawford over on TopRank island and Garcia already turned him down.

U cant just say "they need to fight" and disregard the blantant shyt stopping that from happening. Aka boxing politics/business