Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Brook's Trainer Doesn't See Spence as Best American Welterweight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    I wish Brook's trainer would've been asked "Who is the best at 147?" That would be interesting! The follow-up would be even better, "Why hasn't Brook fought Pacquiao, Bradley, Thurman, or Danny Garcia?"

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by delorean View Post
      winner of this fight will be #3 at ww.

      Pacquiao and thurman the top dogs. I don't even know if bradley still active.

      1. Pac
      2. Thurman
      3. Spence/brook
      4. Bradley (where is he?)
      5. Danny
      pac cant be number 1 if he only fights bums ike vargas and jeff horn.... No way

      Comment


      • #13
        He's not on the same page as Brook. Brook said if he beats Spence he'll become the #1 welterweight. You become the best by beating the best

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by filup79 View Post
          13 years as a pro and his best win is Shawn Porter. Brook is living of beating Porter and getting smashed by GGG. Brook turned pro in 2004 and beat Porter in 2014, so are we saying it took Brook 10 years to fight a credible opponent? What was Brook's best win before Porter? What is Brook's best win after beating Porter?
          But you people keep bringing up that Spence hasn't fought anyone, Spence has been in the game for about 4 years and is doing a lot more than Brook did his first 4 years as a pro.
          It was hilarious when they were arguing about resumes yesterday. Brook, world champ 13 years pro, could only bring up one name Bette better than anyone on Spence, 5 years a pro, resume.

          How can you be a pro for 13 years and a world champ and only Jan have one name on your resume than a kid who has only been fighting for 5 years

          Comment


          • #15
            So fighting Vargas and Horn makes you a TOP WW? Slowly back away from the top rank DICK, PUT IT DOWN...Pac's time is OVER! There is a reason that Pac doesnt fight a "LIVE" dog or a current Champion...Haymon and Arum do business now, and yet You dont see pac matched with ANY of WW's in Haymons stable, He wont even fight Crawford. Pacs time is UP

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by filup79 View Post
              13 years as a pro and his best win is Shawn Porter. Brook is living of beating Porter and getting smashed by GGG. Brook turned pro in 2004 and beat Porter in 2014, so are we saying it took Brook 10 years to fight a credible opponent? What was Brook's best win before Porter? What is Brook's best win after beating Porter?
              But you people keep bringing up that Spence hasn't fought anyone, Spence has been in the game for about 4 years and is doing a lot more than Brook did his first 4 years as a pro.
              Great post.

              Originally posted by DeLorean View Post
              winner of this fight will be #3 at WW.

              Pacquiao and Thurman the top dogs. I don't even know if Bradley still active.

              1. Pac
              2. Thurman
              3. Spence/Brook
              4. Bradley (where is he?)
              5. Danny
              Pacquiao should not be rated #1, imo. As far as resumes and accomplishments, he's undisputed, but he's content fighting guys like Broner, Khan, and Horn, while the other top welters are interested in unifying.

              Its fine. He's earned it. He just shouldn't be seen as 'the guy' anymore. Mannys no higher than 3 for me.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by filup79 View Post
                13 years as a pro and his best win is Shawn Porter. Brook is living of beating Porter and getting smashed by GGG. Brook turned pro in 2004 and beat Porter in 2014, so are we saying it took Brook 10 years to fight a credible opponent? What was Brook's best win before Porter? What is Brook's best win after beating Porter?
                But you people keep bringing up that Spence hasn't fought anyone, Spence has been in the game for about 4 years and is doing a lot more than Brook did his first 4 years as a pro.
                Yeah but as regards to the fight, it doesnt make a difference how long it took for Brook to fight a good fighter, Brook has and Spence hasn't. So one is proven and one is yet to be. That's how it's relevant.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Stylewise Spence is more complete then Garcia and Thurman.. sure nuff it'll be harder to shine vs Brook though

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by frosty-g View Post
                    and where would you be from?
                    From a place where the water is clean! Although, to be honest, my wife, who is british, says the place has improved greatly lately. Not as many scallies apparently! You one of them?

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by steeve steel View Post
                      From a place where the water is clean! Although, to be honest, my wife, who is british, says the place has improved greatly lately. Not as many scallies apparently! You one of them?
                      sheffield actually has some of the best water in the country as its naturally filtered though the rocks in the countryside

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP