Is the size difference between Guillermo Rigondeaux and Vasyl Lomachenko greater than the size difference between Guillermo Rigondeaux and Nonito Donaire?
I've seen Guillermo Rigondeaux's press conference against both Nonito Donaire and Vasyl Lomachenko and compared them. It appeared as if both Nonito Donaire and Vasyl Lomachenko are practically the same size. Therefore, Rigondeaux doesn't look like he is facing a bigger disadvantage against Lomachenko than he already did against Nonito Donaire. Therefore, if Lomachenko wins, Lomachenko's size advantage ALONE can't be attributed to why Lomachenko won since Rigondeaux managed to overcome the same size disadvantage against Nonito Donaire and beat him. Thus, Lomachenko's win should instead be attributed to size + skills instead of purely size.
What do y'all think?
I've seen Guillermo Rigondeaux's press conference against both Nonito Donaire and Vasyl Lomachenko and compared them. It appeared as if both Nonito Donaire and Vasyl Lomachenko are practically the same size. Therefore, Rigondeaux doesn't look like he is facing a bigger disadvantage against Lomachenko than he already did against Nonito Donaire. Therefore, if Lomachenko wins, Lomachenko's size advantage ALONE can't be attributed to why Lomachenko won since Rigondeaux managed to overcome the same size disadvantage against Nonito Donaire and beat him. Thus, Lomachenko's win should instead be attributed to size + skills instead of purely size.
What do y'all think?
Comment