No 1 at heavy has a good resume except Haye n Wlad so why r u trashing Wilder

[therealpugilist]

Tyson Fury has a better resume.

yea...he beat a 40 year old wlad and a cruiserweight cunningham.....yea awesome resume....lol....its pretty bad and one of the worst of any lineal champion in recent times.

[therealpugilist]

No way bro. Ya'll just don't want to give a slick bruvva no props







Dats rayciss

Ortiz resume is azz too, he doesnt get much criticism for it...nor do a lot of the top ten heavyweights

[SN!PER]

They're scared. He's beasting through the division and getting better every fight.

[NaijaD]

their are older fighters with lesser resumes to wilder

the point is, no one has a great resume their so whats with the crap on Wilder campaign.......ALL their resumes suck!!!!

Who are the older heavyweights you are talking about?

Are they claiming to be the best in the world while fighting subpar opposition??

[therealpugilist]

They're scared. He's beasting through the division and getting better every fight.

I'd favor him over everyone outside of Maybe Ortiz...big guy fights like a lil man lol....very skilled......I think he would spark out Joshua,Fury and the rest......Joshua has talent but is methodical and a bit mechanical...wilder is unpredictable, more athletic and that rocket right hand

[therealpugilist]

Who are the older heavyweights you are talking about?

Are they claiming to be the best in the world while fighting subpar opposition??

.....what fighter you know that doesnt think he is the best?

who gives AF about that....everyone has a decent to crappy resume outside of Haye and Wlad so criticize them all

if you say you're the best, so what...youre supposed to feel that way...you dont play boxing...you fight...what grown azz man is gonna admit another man can kick his azzz???

[NaijaD]

.....what fighter you know that doesnt think he is the best?

who gives AF about that....everyone has a decent to crappy resume outside of Haye and Wlad so criticize them all

if you say you're the best, so what...youre supposed to feel that way...you dont play boxing...you fight...what grown azz man is gonna admit another man can kick his azzz???

Again who are you talking about, who are these heavies that are escaping criticism??? Please name them.

If you think you're the best and you have a heavyweight title then you should seek to fight far better opponents than what Wilder has. It's that simple, you're living on another planet if you don't think Wilder deserves flack for his title reign and career up until this point.

[W1LL]

The thing is therealpugilist, I agree with you that Deontay Wilder doesn't have a bad resume. By todays standards anyway, he is racking up victories over contenders at a decent rate. Just saying it's not THE best. I'd agree that Wladimir Klitschko has the best resume but he's on the slide. Then it's Tyson Fury and then Deontay Wilder. If Anthony Joshua beats Wlad then he'll be up there too. David Haye has some good wins but they were 5-7 years ago and his latest comeback is a bit of a circus act. Joseph Parker is building an impressive resume too. Carlos Takam, Andy Ruiz, Jr. and then Hughie Fury. Those three are at least on a par with anything Wilder or Joshua have done.

[Beercules]

yea...he beat a 40 year old wlad and a cruiserweight cunningham.....yea awesome resume....lol....its pretty bad and one of the worst of any lineal champion in recent times.

Is it better than Wilders yes or no?

[therealpugilist]

Is it better than Wilders yes or no?

.....did i say it was or was not

is it impressive or good resume was the premise of the thread....stay on topic..

its not impressive and one of the worst of any lineal heavyweight champion ever