Lomachenko or Crawford- Who's better P4P?

[buckfuddy]

Floyd @ 130 was a higher calibre fighter than loma. Sorry. Go watch his fights.

I've watched all PBF fights and his 130 fights (Ndou, Cast, Chop-chop) are my favourite, but Floyd never met fighter as skillful and intelligent in the ring as Loma. Obviously mu judgement is based more on Lomas amateur career, he didn't make a proper argument in pros yet. And I doubt he would, simply doesn't have p4p caliber guys around him – Garcia and Bud, that's basically it. Rigo is small and old, Gamboa is shot.

[Dip_Slide]

Can't really say, both fought decent opposition and been champs at 2 weight divisions as pros, Lomachenko had by far the better amateur career (one of the best of all times if not the best considering his age) but judging by the eye test I think Crawford is the more complete pro, but only time will tell, they both still have a lot to go out there and prove and they can still improve as fighters because they're young.