Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Crawford: I Don't Believe Loma, Canelo Have Passed Me On P4P List

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by factsarenice View Post
    Canelo unified that weight class and never uses drugs to cheat....
    Neither does Dillian Whyte.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post
      Saul Alvarez and Vasyl Lomachenko have noteworthy stains on their record, that should be considered as much as their achievements in their climb up the ranks of the coveted P4P.

      Canelo has had close questionable wins and a draw -- not including the one Saul had against Jorge Juarez when Canelo was a teenager. A failed Performance Enhancing Drugs test, which elicits doubt of Alvarez natural ability and also puts his wins into question prior to his failed PED test.

      Bumchenko, lost to a glorified bum, gained significant accolades in the sport through political influence by his promoter ( Toprank ) and the sanctioning bodies ( most recently WBC ) and has struggled badly at his natural weight at 135.

      Terence is spotless, free of any of these glaring and upsetting truths. Crawford is so feared and dominant that all the other welters over at PBC are avoiding him, despite the fact that he was a 140 pounder not long ago, this tells you who is the alpha among the P4P.

      Terence Crawford is the best in the world.
      When you fight the best there will be times when you get "stains" on your record. Crawford is spotless because he fights bums, cans, and one legged fighters. So of course he will look good.

      He's nowhere near the top of anything.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post
        The 'Boogieman' was exposed by a overrated welter jumping up two weights ( Kelly Brook) and Danny Jacobs before Canelo got the controversial win over Gennady.

        Dont get me started in that cash-out move by washed Sergey Kovalev.


        lmao, you know youre a delusional hater when you spin getting your face literally broken and being stopped as exposing someone.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Death_Adder View Post
          When you fight the best there will be times when you get "stains" on your record. Crawford is spotless because he fights bums, cans, and one legged fighters. So of course he will look good.

          He's nowhere near the top of anything.
          There is little to no debate, Terence has fought the best throughout his career from 135-140 and dominated. You can not objectively dissmiss most of his career to suit your argument.

          That's like taking Canelo's pre PED run from 155 ( HA!) to 168, and only recognizing his crappy win over euro-bum Kovalev ( HA!).

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post
            The 'Boogieman' was exposed by a overrated welter jumping up two weights ( Kelly Brook) and Danny Jacobs before Canelo got the controversial win over Gennady.

            Dont get me started in that cash-out move by washed Sergey Kovalev.
            Brooks, Jacobs, and a washed Kovalev are greater accomplishments that low blowing Khan to a win, fighting a one legged nobody fighter, fighting some bum named "Mean Machine" and going on 4 fights now a welterweight without a significant win.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post
              There is little to no debate, Terence has fought the best throughout his career from 135-140 and dominated. You can not objectively dissmiss most of his career to suit your argument.

              That's like taking Canelo's pre PED run from 155 ( HA!) to 168, and only recognizing his crappy win over euro-bum Kovalev ( HA!).
              List his best wins. Postol in 2016? Gamboa in 2014? Two B-level guys at best?

              Fuck outta here.

              Comment


              • #37
                P4p is supposed to be, who would be the best if size/weight wasn't a factor. If they were all the same size/weight, Crawford would wash both Loma and Canelo. Now I know people want to argue about level of comp faced. But if you know boxing, you can tell who is the better all around fighter. Just like everyone with sense knew that Roy Jones was light yrs better than Oscar, even though Oscar faced the better opposition.

                Comment


                • #38
                  If they were the same weight, Crawford would certainly not wash Canelo. No one has wash Canelo. And Crawford is no Mayweather. Canelo is perhaps the best fighter of this generation. His resume proves it.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Canelo has made a great case for being #1. Crawford and Lomachenko are stuck in neutral with the latter having a slightly better resume moving forward.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Sure to get flamed on this one! Personally, I don't feel like Crawford's resume is that great. He hasn't done enough to be ahead of Canelo or Loma.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP