One could argue that Danny is the better overall boxer and has the better resume.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
If Charlo is an A Level fighter why isn't Jacobs?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Sheldon312 View PostOne could argue that Danny is the better overall boxer and has the better resume.
Comment
-
I don't why you consider Charlo and A level fighter. I think Jacobs is a better fighter. He is quick, mobile, has a good ring IQ, power, understands positioning and spacing. He lacks a little bit of fundamentals because he'll improvise on the fly. Charlo is slightly better fundamentally. The jury is still out on all the other qualities. I think some people are still holding the Pirog loss and the KD's to Mora against Jacobs but he's a solid fighter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by harwri008 View PostI don't why you consider Charlo and A level fighter. I think Jacobs is a better fighter. He is quick, mobile, has a good ring IQ, power, understands positioning and spacing. He lacks a little bit of fundamentals because he'll improvise on the fly. Charlo is slightly better fundamentally. The jury is still out on all the other qualities. I think some people are still holding the Pirog loss and the KD's to Mora against Jacobs but he's a solid fighter.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by JubeiJacobs got beat by GGG fair and square, only people that have not fought GGG yet can be considered A level fighters by the dummygraphic because in the dummygraphics deluded minds in a fantasy matchup everyone who hasnt fought GGG beats him easily.
Comment
Comment