Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Does clean punching, ring generalship, and defense only matter when Mayweather fights

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Reloaded View Post
    Its not only scoring punches as in number, the judges see the power within the shots landed and then the effect of the punches which in turn moves into the area of ring generalship and defense, effective aggression etc, they are all elements of fighting that judges score and why close fights are really hard to score as there is always a variable that don't add up, Id like to see 5 judges in big fights the other 2 in a closed room watching the broadcast.
    nooo...no...not if includes commentary. Actually joe rogan had a decent idea...he was saying there should be like 10 judges watching on tv monitors somewhere else entirely.

    Comment


    • #12
      Superior defense?

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by lopetego View Post
        Clean effective punches is the only criteria that matters when it comes to scoring

        Ring generalship is some ambiguous **** that means nothing in the end

        Defense doesn't count at all...you don't get points by making your opponent fail, no matter what the fans of featherfisted "slick" fighters like Floyd claim

        Floyd outlanded his opponents and even his fluffy jabs were counted as power punches by judges, that's how he won for the last decade
        Bulldust, every judge sees ring generalship and will score for it, subconsciously he gives points in a close round to a guy he subliminally feels won the round and is controlling the fight, defence, effective aggression etc its all this stuff that will influence the way a fight is scored.

        Comment


        • #14
          GGG Defends with his FACE. Might have granite chin but when your face starts swelling that gets painful hence the lack of ring generalism

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
            Superior defense?

            Not superior, but underrated imo. He parried and slipped a lot more than many are giving credit for. He just isnt flashy with it.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Real King Kong View Post
              nooo...no...not if includes commentary. Actually joe rogan had a decent idea...he was saying there should be like 10 judges watching on tv monitors somewhere else entirely.
              No no no , not with commentary just the vision.

              And also a trial by camera where a low blow that wasn't seen or a trip that wasn't ruled etc can be instantly set right and over ruled. I hate seeing a blatant fowl but because the ref didn't see it its not ruled, that's wrong when the rest of the world sees it instantly in slow motion.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Reloaded View Post
                Bulldust, every judge sees ring generalship and will score for it, subconsciously he gives points in a close round to a guy he subliminally feels won the round and is controlling the fight, defence, effective aggression etc its all this stuff that will influence the way a fight is scored.
                clean, effective punches landed is what you count in a fight

                the rest is nothing but pretentious bull**** and redundant crap

                defense doesn't count for **** when it comes to points

                I don't care if you make your opponent miss more than a drunk guy trying to hit a pinata, if he still outlanded you and hurt you because you were too busy doing your sweet pea stuff to even throw punches in that round, then sorry, he won that round.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
                  Look at the punch stats. At the end of Mayweather's fights he lands more punches than his opponent. Yes and that includes jabs. In his fight with Canelo he landed a lot of jabs and I assure you each of them counted as a scoring blow. Canelo has come out on the short end of the punch count in both of his fights with Golovkin. It's a double standard.
                  you forgot to mention the forearm and elbows floyd throws that count as punches

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Reloaded View Post
                    No no no , not with commentary just the vision.

                    And also a trial by camera where a low blow that wasn't seen or a trip that wasn't ruled etc can be instantly set right and over ruled. I hate seeing a blatant fowl but because the ref didn't see it its not ruled, that's wrong when the rest of the world sees it instantly in slow motion.
                    Yea...most other sports use replays and what not. It could be dealt with between rounds.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Boxfan83 View Post
                      ..?


                      I saw a fighter this weekend control the ring, show superior defense, and land the cleaner/harder shots (higher percentage of shots) and the Boo birds are still crying...

                      Anyways thats part of the reason boxing gets a bad look. Its like this weekend was about who was more Mexican vs. boxings "supposed" rules...
                      I agree with you. If you're a boxing fan, you had to appreciate how Golovkin controlled the distance from the opening bell. It was a great fight and kudos to Alvarez for heart but Golovkin clearly out boxed him.
                      Bad decisions are the norm in boxing these days, but it's still hard to see a guy lose his titles at the hands of the judges.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP