Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI-
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why do people think Thomas Hearns would beat Floyd so easily?
Collapse
-
-
Out of Hearns, Leonard, and Duran I think Hearns reach, piston like jab, and right hand would've given Floyd the most trouble. I think Pryor would've given Floyd a hell of a fight at 135.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI- View Postlike ESPN's basketball list
But Lebron at #3 and Curry and Paul at 23 and 34 was just ****ing crazy. I mean I love Curry, the wife and kids watch with me and we all go crazy. He is must see TV no doubt. best shooter I've ever seen.
But better than Isiah Thomas.
I hate ESPN!!!
Comment
-
It's real simple, every decade you go back you add bonuses. If the fight is in black & white, they're at least twice as good as the boxers around today. That is because until colour they weren't able to capture the technique/skills exhibited in the bout properly. Something to do with frequency but back in the 30s they moved around the ring like they were on ice.
No one can really explain this phenomenon but it's correct and if you disagree, you don't know shit about boxing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostLOL. I responded to your post. I was happy Kareem finally got the respect he deserved. Frankly, he should probably be #1.
But Lebron at #3 and Curry and Paul at 23 and 34 was just ****ing crazy. I mean I love Curry, the wife and kids watch with me and we all go crazy. He is must see TV no doubt. best shooter I've ever seen.
But better than Isiah Thomas.
I hate ESPN!!!
as if you didnt have enough reasons to root against the guy...i will enjoy watching ESPN spin another LeBron failure in the playoffs this year
Comment
-
Originally posted by D-MiZe View PostIt's real simple, every decade you go back you add bonuses. If the fight is in black & white, they're at least twice as good as the boxers around today. That is because until colour they weren't able to capture the technique/skills exhibited in the bout properly. Something to do with frequency but back in the 30s they moved around the ring like they were on ice.
No one can really explain this phenomenon but it's correct and if you disagree, you don't know shit about boxing.
Comment
Comment