Originally posted by dannnnn
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Abel Sanchez told Saunders that Golovkin would never fight him
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by strykr619 View PostWho the hell pays 10% of 100 million to a trainer, you are a special kind of STUPID.
Comment
-
Originally posted by icha View Postgolden boy offered saunders to fight on canelo-smith udercard at texas stadium in order to get the canelo fight after that, saunders flat out said no...Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View PostHe was right. Sent him an offer. BJS accepted. GGG swerved him
Golovkin and Saunders agreed yet again to unify the titles last year in August at the Forum, California until a last ditch attempt by Golden Boy in caving in to Golovkin's demands meant the GGG-Saunders fight was scuppered and instead we got Canelo V GGG 2.
Those are the facts. Saunders isn't to blame for both times falling through.
As for Canelo V Saunders, Canelo was supposed to return in December of 2016. He owed HBO a regular non-PPV date. Golden Boy wanted Saunders as chief support vs Gabe Rosado with the intention of leading to Canelo V Saunders but it didn't happen. Firstly, Saunders balked at the idea of facing Rosado, who he publicly denounced as a journeyman and felt there would be nothing to gain. Secondly and more importantly, Golden Boy refused to guarantee Saunders that he would fight Canelo next, a term of the contract which Saunders wanted if he was to fight a Rosado-calibre fighter. Saunders felt GB were just using him to fill up the card and felt disrespected, a situation made worse given GB refused flat out to guarantee Saunders v Canelo would be next. Thirdly, Canelo suffered an ankle injury, the card got cancelled and it paved the way for GGG V Jacobs.
Those ae the facts. It's all online
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by E-Thug View PostGolovkin and Saunders agreed to unify the titles in June of 2017, agreement was finalised before Jacobs V GGG with the unification to take place during an expo being held in Kazakhstan in June but the way the Jacobs fight panned out meant Golovkin and his team didn't want to fight in June anymore and instead rested up and went straight into Canelo 1.
Golovkin and Saunders agreed yet again to unify the titles last year in August at the Forum, California until a last ditch attempt by Golden Boy in caving in to Golovkin's demands meant the GGG-Saunders fight was scuppered and instead we got Canelo V GGG 2.
Those are the facts. Saunders isn't to blame for both times falling through.
As for Canelo V Saunders, Canelo was supposed to return in December of 2016. He owed HBO a regular non-PPV date. Golden Boy wanted Saunders as chief support vs Gabe Rosado with the intention of leading to Canelo V Saunders but it didn't happen. Firstly, Saunders balked at the idea of facing Rosado, who he publicly denounced as a journeyman and felt there would be nothing to gain. Secondly and more importantly, Golden Boy refused to guarantee Saunders that he would fight Canelo next, a term of the contract which Saunders wanted if he was to fight a Rosado-calibre fighter. Saunders felt GB were just using him to fill up the card and felt disrespected, a situation made worse given GB refused flat out to guarantee Saunders v Canelo would be next. Thirdly, Canelo suffered an ankle injury, the card got cancelled and it paved the way for GGG V Jacobs.
Those ae the facts. It's all online
Jacobs scared them so bad they've refused to fight anyone of note except Canelo. GGG even said he doesn't want to fight Jacobs again
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mammoth View PostAt 6:27. Sanchez butt hurt as hell lol.
'PROMOTERS & TV HAVE F****** THEMSELVES' - BILLY JOE SAUNDERS GETS REAL ON JOSHUA LOSS, TYSON FURY https://t.co/gDxxBDzZzx
— iFL TV™ (@IFLTV) June 14, 2019
Comment
-
Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View PostAgreed to before the Jacob's fight right? Before there were any Canelo talks right?
He dropped the lesser opponent for less money to make the biggest fight in boxing.
If he had turned down Canelo people would have called it a duck. In fact, you would have called it a duck.
Comment
-
Originally posted by drew1830 View PostSo what?
He dropped the lesser opponent for less money to make the biggest fight in boxing.
If he had turned down Canelo people would have called it a duck. In fact, you would have called it a duck.
Comment
Comment