Announcement

**D.I.E.S.E.L** · 06-25-2010, 01:13 PM

Originally posted by Valero 27-0 View Post

they are 13 and 14 I believe.

First question, what do you care?

Secondly, I don't see anything wrong with what they have on

**Golden Boi 360** · 06-25-2010, 01:15 PM

Originally posted by D.I.E.S.E.L View Post

First question, what do you care?

Secondly, I don't see anything wrong with what they have on

i care because i want to see how many of you guys find them attractive.

**KESSLER** · 06-25-2010, 01:16 PM

Originally posted by Valero 27-0 View Post

i care because i want to see how many of you guys find them attractive.

I do.......

**wazaa.** · 06-25-2010, 01:16 PM

well... they dont look 13 and 14... thats for sure.

**krispy kreme** · 06-25-2010, 01:17 PM

Originally posted by wazaa. View Post

well... they dont look 13 and 14... thats for sure.

They don't, I am still trying figure out who is who.

**Zig Zag.** · 06-25-2010, 01:17 PM

:wank:

_______________

**Golden Boi 360** · 06-25-2010, 01:18 PM

Originally posted by Crumble21 View Post

:wank:

_______________

Green K sent.

**The Situation** · 06-25-2010, 01:21 PM

Lol, I can't even find someone on the picture you posted that look minor ( 18 in Canada lol), let alone someone who looks 13-14

**2501** · 06-25-2010, 01:32 PM

Naw, they look like respectable young ladies. Until their sex tapes come out, that is.

Are Kim Kardashian's younger sisters dressing appropriate for their age?