I have no problem with judging fighters based on how well they're performing in their weight class to determine who has been the most successful for their size.
Anthony Joshua would obviously destroy GGG, but "pound for pound" I would rate GGG higher because he has accomplished more at middleweight than Joshua has accomplished at heavyweight. GGG has unified more belts, made more defenses, proven himself more clearly as the #1 in his division, etc.
I have no problem with judging fighters based on how well they're performing in their weight class to determine who has been the most successful for their size.
Anthony Joshua would obviously destroy GGG, but "pound for pound" I would rate GGG higher because he has accomplished more at middleweight than Joshua has accomplished at heavyweight. GGG has unified more belts, made more defenses, proven himself more clearly as the #1 in his division, etc.
But if everything was equal, who would win? GGG would probably a more rugged Klits or Provetkin
Comment