Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Of all the 4 alphabet sanctioning bodies...which is best?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    IBF by far.

    IBF

    WBO





    WBC



























    WBA

    Comment


    • #22
      WBU or nothing for me.

      Comment


      • #23
        The wbo had a dead guy climb there ranks .....

        Comment


        • #24
          Green is best ......

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by lets rumble View Post
            The wbo had a dead guy climb there ranks .....
            That was years ago though. If you wanted to say they were the worst back then because of that then sure but like 15 years has passed since then and other organizations have been as terrible or worse.

            Comment


            • #26
              Of the four, the IBF by far, it's not even debatable.

              The belts are meaningless unless your a fighter, the prestige of course and the fact a belt holder is entitled to a 75/25 split, in some cases now multiple belt holders 80/20. I understand why the promoters such as Hearn and Haymon like to keep their own guys with a belt as opposed to losing their 75 percent split to a a rival promoter.

              They're all corrupt or corruptible but I'd say the IBF the least, they do in fact at least attempt to enforce their rules and get ruthless when needed, the Carl Froch situation recently was admirable and Kell Brook having to face Jo Jo Dan when he was hoping to pursue other avenues of interest. I like the IBF the most, though their rankings and ratings system is peculiar to say the least, though they do tend to create the most worthy and deserving of challengers through their mandated fight offs two semis and a final eliminator etc. props to them.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Raonic View Post
                That was years ago though. If you wanted to say they were the worst back then because of that then sure but like 15 years has passed since then and other organizations have been as terrible or worse.
                Wasn't that Ali Raymi recently a recipient of climbing the rankings whilst in fact being as dead as the dodo ? Not sure it was the WBO either way.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
                  Asking a boxing fan which alphabet group he thinks is the best should be like asking a guy who just got jumped which guy among those who jumped him was the best fighter or asking a girl who just got gang raped who had the best dick. Alphabet groups acting individually, but with similar goals have made the true definition of the term "champion" obsolete in boxing. F#ck all of dem corrupt mfers.
                  hear hear da greeness comin yo way........

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Scott-Weiland View Post
                    Wasn't that Ali Raymi recently a recipient of climbing the rankings whilst in fact being as dead as the dodo ? Not sure it was the WBO either way.
                    It was WBA.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      The IBF was too stupid to realize that they couldn't get away with tin pot corruption on US soil like the other organizations. So they were busted and cleaned out of totally corrupt fat asses like Bob Lee. Since then you are right they are straight shooters that actually do what organizations are supposed to do. The only problem that I have with them is that they still rank US club fighters too high. How many eliminators does a Derrick Rossy get because he is American?

                      As for the other organizations they are complete jokes and the WBA might as well be the WWE.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP