I think it's the most prestigious award that the boxer could ever have because they only give that award to the very best fighter of that decade like ALI, LEONARD, PACQUIAO....
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
FIGHTER OF THE DECADE the most prestigious award.
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by pasawayako View PostI think it's the most prestigious award that the boxer could ever have because they only give that award to the very best fighter of that decade like ALI, LEONARD, PACQUIAO....
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostBut, at times they don't give it to the most deserving guy. So how could it be the most prestigious if the guy who deserved it didn't win it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostBut, at times they don't give it to the most deserving guy. So how could it be the most prestigious if the guy who deserved it didn't win it?
Fight Hype disagreed with all of the above. I guess the man those above chose is undeserving because Fight Hype thinks otherwise.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pasawayako View PostWhy do u think that the guy isn't deserving when he's been voted majority by the most boxing experts, boxing analyst?
Originally posted by Sugar Sting Ray View PostHBO, the Ring, BWAA, ESPN, and Sports Illustrated all picked the same man as Fighter of the Decade.
Fight Hype disagreed with all of the above. I guess the man those above chose is undeserving because Fight Hype thinks otherwise.
WTF are you talking about? Fighthype? OK dumbass.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostI didn't say the guy didn't deserve it. I was saying that at times there were more deserving people.
Comment
-
Originally posted by I am Godsoon as these same experts say something you dont like you're gonna try to discredit them,so its all subjective and pointless....who cares
Comment
-
Originally posted by pasawayako View PostMaybe u r right when it was a close race between them but when it was overwhelming just like pac and the rest then i think there's no controversy about that.
However, that was not the decade I was talking about
There are times when is not even close yet the guy who deserves it doesn't get it. Like Emile Griffith deserved to win FOTD or also Carlos Monzon in the 70's deserved it more than anyone and it wasn't even close yet didn't get it. Duran also had a case for the 70's.
Point is if the most deserving guys don't get it. Then how could it be the most prestigious award?
Comment
-
Comment