Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Which is worse? Floyd vs Pac (2010) or Alvarez vs Golovkin (2016)?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Which is worse? Floyd vs Pac (2010) or Alvarez vs Golovkin (2016)?

    round em up boys!
    8
    2010 - 40 million and NO WADA acknowledged testing?
    50.00%
    4
    2016 - 10 million for 97K vs AT&T hooliganism?
    50.00%
    4

  • #2
    40 million is worse.

    Comment


    • #3
      Good Drama is what keeps sport alive,lets say this fight allready happend in May,now we have nothing,boxing is dead for couple of years.Now we have so many stiupid fanboys and to september we will have even more and they will all buy PPV.

      Comment


      • #4
        40 million is worse because back in 2010 Mayweather and Pac were making almost EQUAL PPV buys, with a million buys for each fighter. And Pac wanted 50-50 or atleast a 55-45, but got lowballed with a 40-million flat offer from Mayweather which is ******ed.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Thraxox View Post
          40 million is worse because back in 2010 Mayweather and Pac were making almost EQUAL PPV buys, with a million buys for each fighter. And Pac wanted 50-50 or atleast a 55-45, but got lowballed with a 40-million flat offer from Mayweather which is ******ed.
          In all fairness team Pac just turned down a 50/50 split because a he scared of needles.

          Floyd was really trying to stick it to him.


          No pun intended.

          Comment


          • #6
            interesting... #WADA style testing was the reason why Pac didn't shoot for it back then. The word from industry wasn'T about the money, but about testing...

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Dosumpthin View Post
              In all fairness team Pac just turned down a 50/50 split because a he scared of needles.

              Floyd was really trying to stick it to him.


              No pun intended.
              No, Pacquiao turned down a 50-50 fight from Mayweather because the blood testing was too close from the fight. He was drained when he fought Morales the first time because they took two ounces of blood from him 1 day before the match.

              "Well, he now agrees to a 14 day in? Well he got the chance to accept that, but right now I want it just a day before the match!"

              - Floyd Mayweather.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Thraxox View Post
                No, Pacquiao turned down a 50-50 fight from Mayweather because the blood testing was too close from the fight. He was drained when he fought Morales the first time because they took two ounces of blood from him 1 day before the match.

                "Well, he now agrees to a 14 day in? Well he got the chance to accept that, but right now I want it just a day before the match!"

                - Floyd Mayweather.
                #48ism

                Brian Kenny: ''What about 15 days before the fight? Would that still bother you?''
                Pacquiao: ''15 days before the fight inhibits training. It's not good to draw blood during that date...it inhibits training.''

                Cmon, Pacquiao using the word ''inhibit'' that ESPN shıt was all scripted in play with Pac's publicist's coaching him what to say. You don'T see the realtime footage as it would be an awkward interview. that was all cut and edited to make the interview seem fluid. Ironically, the conversation and questioning was already awkward and it seemed like Kenny was running out of options to play it off...obviously Kenny knows what's going on.

                only gullibles bought into the 15day and swerving off WADA...Arum and Koncz made sure the gullible's believed their part.

                Comment


                • #9
                  in 2010 the offer was 50/50 with random testing

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by don larryx View Post
                    in 2010 the offer was 50/50 with random testing
                    ''why would you walk away from 40million dollars on the table just not to give some blood?!.'' - Atlas (2010)

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP