Stop the stupidity, Fury is not lineal.

[Chrismart]

Lineal can be a pain. There's not always a universal opinion and when the waters become murky in a situation like this one, it can split thoughts.

[Robbie Barrett]

Lineal can be a pain. There's not always a universal opinion and when the waters become murky in a situation like this one, it can split thoughts.

All the sites that keep records agree Fury isn't lineal. We have Fury and Wilder fans that think he is and both are biased.

[koolkc107]

You're a clown. Chagaev was behind Wlad and Vitali, they gave Wlad a pass because he couldn't fight his brother, which makes it questionable.

Originally, the lineal was supposed to be Wlad vs Haye but Haye bowed out.

The lineal doesn't need one vs two, Einstein.

And again, the Dec 1 fight more than qualifies to be a lineal fight.

YOU HAVE NO ANSWER TO REFUTE THAT!

[Robbie Barrett]

Originally, the lineal was supposed to be Wlad vs Haye but Haye bowed out.

The lineal doesn't need one vs two, Einstein.

And again, the Dec 1 fight more than qualifies to be a lineal fight.

YOU HAVE NO ANSWER TO REFUTE THAT!

Wlad-Haye wasn't going to be lineal Chagaev was rated above Haye.

To establish a new lineage it needs to be 1 v 2. Just google it you bellend.

[koolkc107]

Wlad-Haye wasn't going to be lineal Chagaev was rated above Haye.

To establish a new lineage it needs to be 1 v 2. Just google it you bellend.

No, it simply has to be a fight between 2 top ranked fighters, any top 10 fighter will do.

But, yeah I stand corrected on Haye.

See how easy that was, to admit an error?

You are making a huge one here.

Dec 1 is a lineal fight and any boxing historian worth his salt will see it that way.

[club fighter]

LMAO!! Robbie B. getting spanked on his own thread.

[Robbie Barrett]

No, it simply has to be a fight between 2 top ranked fighters, any top 10 fighter will do.

But, yeah I stand corrected on Haye.

See how easy that was, to admit an error?

You are making a huge one here.

Dec 1 is a lineal fight and any boxing historian worth his salt will see it that way.

You can't become lineal fighting any top 10 fighter. I've had enough of this ******ed ****. You won't do a simple google search to see you're wrong, you're going on ignore for being a ******.

[Robbie Barrett]

LMAO!! Robbie B. getting spanked on his own thread.

If you think any top 10 fighter can become lineal.

[STREET CLEANER]

You need to explain this further.

That, or admit it is sprinkled with horse manure.

Fury is still "the man who beat the man".

I still consider him lineal and therefore this fight has the lineal title at stake.

But, even if you don't think Fury is the lineal right now, all you need to fill the lineal title is a box-off between two fighters qualified to claim it or two otherwise top ranked fighters.

Theoretically, a lineal box-off could take place between any two top 10 fighters.

We certainly have that. Actually we have much more than that.

We have arguably the best heavyweight in boxing, the longest reigning champion, going up against that same last lineal who never lost his title in the ring.

This is a lineal fight.

I was being sarcastic. The nay sayers are down playing this fight.

[STREET CLEANER]

If Joshua was fighting Fury you'd be ****ting all over it. Just because it's an American that struggles staying on his own feet when throwing a punch it's fine and for a fake lineal title.

Fury is the lineal champ just like Briggs won it. Those are facts.

Since you are on the theme what is the financial breakdown of all of this?