Originally posted by Reloaded
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Would you rather win in a close fight or one sided but weight cheating your opponent?
Collapse
-
Last edited by whirlwind; 07-02-2012, 09:31 PM.
-
Originally posted by whirlwind View PostThat is the idea. You are the bigger fighter then trick your smaller opponent and made him think you actually will meet him at 144. To make it more believable you signed an agreement about the fight should be at 144. After that you laugh at yourself thinking "that fool he really thinks I give him a leveling field?" lmao.
so why sign the contract in the first place?... those fighters never complain about catch weights... they know their body and well being more than you do...
level playing field?... why floyd only asked for "level playing field" against a lightweight at a catch weight that he never met on his 40th professional fight?... can we also conclude that floyd's first 40 pro fights are not on a level playing field?...
Comment
-
If you're a fighter it's a choice between:
1. Legacy and beating your opponent at his best - greater risk of defeat
2. Money beating your opponent with an advantage - lesser risk of defeat
If you're a fan (not a nuthugger), you want to see your favourite fighter beat their opponent at their best because it's worth more to their legacy.Last edited by Weebler I; 07-02-2012, 09:32 PM.
Comment
Comment