Monfils is more entertaining to watch than all 3 though.
Let's see any of them try this serving at 15 all and a break down:
As for being more athletic, it's hard to tell. I think he is arguably more agile than those 3 but his stamina is questionable, he always seems out on his feet midway through the 4th set in slams.
No way. Monfils is extremely athletic if nothing else.
Have them run 100m. Monfils wins.
Test their vertical. Monfils wins.
Have them run a short shuddle. Monfils or Nadal would win.
Have them run 400m. Murray probably takes that.
But my point is. Monfils is easily top 3 athletic players if not #1.
Just like footy. Being the best athlete doesn't mean you're the best player.
He's my favorite player but what a waste of talent. I only rate 2 as a bigger waste of talent than him. Tsonga and Gasquet.
You know Murray was a weak ass 17-19 year old throwing up on the court and **** not being able to make 5 rounds etc.. look at him now.. he can go and go and go..
If these others showed half his attitude it would put them in a great position.. Murray is not just conditioning though.. he is a great player..you DON'T win a slam in this era if you don't + the 4 or 5? finals he made
No way. Monfils is extremely athletic if nothing else.
Have them run 100m. Monfils wins.
Test their vertical. Monfils wins.
Have them run a short shuddle. Monfils or Nadal would win.
Have them run 400m. Murray probably takes that.
But my point is. Monfils is easily top 3 athletic players if not #1.
Just like footy. Being the best athlete doesn't mean you're the best player.
He's my favorite player but what a waste of talent. I only rate 2 as a bigger waste of talent than him. Tsonga and Gasquet.
Sorry but that's the ******ed American way of thinking.
Any random scrub that can jump, or run a 40 yard dash automatically equals an athletic god.
I didn't watch Murray when he was younger but he made me a fan when he played Federer at the AO finals.
When he plays aggressive, he can beat anyone in the world. Has a great return too. I just hate when he decides to stand 8ft behind the baseline and play like Wozniacki.
Sorry but that's the ******ed American way of thinking.
Any random scrub that can jump, or run a 40 yard dash automatically equals an athletic god.
How about just have them play tennis?.
All those things would show pure athleticism. Nothing more.
I also said, as a tennis player, Monfils isn't better than them. Athleticism wise, I believe he is superior to them but playing the sport, they beat him hands down.
All those things would show pure athleticism. Nothing more.
I also said, as a tennis player, Monfils isn't better than them. Athleticism wise, I believe he is superior to them but playing the sport, they beat him hands down.
Comment