Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

>>> Alvarez' resume is better than Lomachenko's...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by Lopez_Boxing View Post
    And it's crazy to not like either of these guys.
    Why? Should we all think like you? Canelo and Lomachenko shouldn't be compared. It's a disgrace.

    Canelo is a boss and his accomplishments shouldn't even be mentioned along with Lomachenko. Who is Lomachenko? The guy who lost to Salido and went life and death with Linares and Pedraza? Dam these fanboys.

    Fuck your fanboyism.

    Comment


    • #82
      Of course Canelo's resume is better. Anyone who says otherwise is just an idiot and a lomasexual.

      I'm sick of these eastern euro wannabes, they have been super sensitive since Canelo ruined GGG.

      Comment


      • #83
        Usyk has a better resume than both of them.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by Fabes88 View Post
          It was his second fight. What he has done since holds a lot more importance. If they were to fight now what would happen? He’s improved since then.
          Maybe - but it doesn't detract from the fact that Alvarez has the better resume...

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by BM dnobagaV View Post
            Usyk has a better resume than both of them.
            And then you woke up...

            Comment


            • #86
              Easy to have a good resume when you can't lose on the cards. No one denies that Canelo can fight because he clearly can. But if he was anyone else, he should have 2-3 losses instead of just to Floyd.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by DaFan View Post
                Why? Should we all think like you? Canelo and Lomachenko shouldn't be compared. It's a disgrace.

                Canelo is a boss and his accomplishments shouldn't even be mentioned along with Lomachenko. Who is Lomachenko? The guy who lost to Salido and went life and death with Linares and Pedraza? Dam these fanboys.

                Fuck your fanboyism.
                thats what davis keeps saying

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by DaFan View Post
                  Why? Should we all think like you? Canelo and Lomachenko shouldn't be compared. It's a disgrace.

                  Canelo is a boss and his accomplishments shouldn't even be mentioned along with Lomachenko. Who is Lomachenko? The guy who lost to Salido and went life and death with Linares and Pedraza? Dam these fanboys.

                  Fuck your fanboyism.
                  You're weird as shlt. I have no idea what the fck you're talking about. I just said they are both entertaining boxers. What's not to like? You're weird as shlt

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by Nay_Sayer View Post

                    NICHOLAS WALTERS EXPLAINS DECISION TO QUIT AGAINST LOMACHENKO; INSISTS INACTIVITY TO BLAME
                    What? Dude quit. There are MANY boxers that came back after long lay offs that didn't Quit in the middle of the fight. He accepted the fight. He had a training camp. He quit. Not because of an injury. Really wasn't even taking a beating. He just quit because he was out matched. Loma made FOUR opponents quit in a row

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by DaFan View Post
                      Why? Should we all think like you? Canelo and Lomachenko shouldn't be compared. It's a disgrace.

                      Canelo is a boss and his accomplishments shouldn't even be mentioned along with Lomachenko. Who is Lomachenko? The guy who lost to Salido and went life and death with Linares and Pedraza? Dam these fanboys.

                      Fuck your fanboyism.
                      You mean, how he won at least 9 rounds to Pedraza's 3, and scored two knockdowns? That's life and death?

                      Linares, the clearly bigger man who he stopped despite size advantage? I won't even start arguing about the scoring, I was there live and thought it was at best 6 - 3 (plus Linares knockdown), but what does that matter when Lomachenko stopped him in the 10th round and we didn't see the last rounds? Lomachenko was boxing very well for the first 5 rounds before Linares picked steam up in the 6th with the knockdown.


                      The guy who lost to Salido
                      You keep bringing that loss up, even though everyone and their mothers knows in a rematch who would win. Not just that, but it happened 5 years ago and he's beaten far better fighters since then.

                      I guess we should classify Canelo as a bum, since he scored a draw against Jorge Juarez who finished his career at 8-27. You know, since apparently fighters can never right their past failures.



                      Maybe while we're at it, we can discuss Gervonta Davis' illegal punch (lol, called a KO) against Francisco Fonseca?

                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvkigomSj90

                      Wow, Davis got a robbery win against a 2nd-rate fighter. That must mean Davis is a bum.
                      Last edited by UNBIASED BOXING; 01-23-2019, 10:32 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP