Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What does lineal champ mean to you?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Roman Moreno View PostPac-Cotto was a good fight.
Pac-Mosley wasn't half decent. It was crap.
Pac-Clottey might be considered half decent, not Pac-Mosley.
Pac-Diaz was decent.
Pac-De La Hoya was crap
Pac-Hatton was a good fight
Pac-Cotto was a good fight
Pac-Clottey was decent/okay
Pac-Margarito was crap
Pac-Mosley was crap
Pac-JMM was crap going into it
Pac-Bradley is a very good fight
Comment
-
Not much like it use to, where it was easily definable who the 'man' was. Now its subjective and always open to interpretation. Now you have a sea of champs, and other than those who you know are the truly elites, its difficult to distinguish and then you resort to analyzing round by round each fight.
So I read lineal champ, and its just a ho-hum talking point just to make someone sound relevant.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostHes fighting Cotto at 154 so then he'll be "ranked" (your favourite term lol) at 154. So Pac and Ortiz will be free to fight for the lineage!
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by 4CornersKid View PostAgree. Since Marquez in 08'....
Pac-Diaz was decent.
Pac-De La Hoya was crap
Pac-Hatton was a good fight
Pac-Cotto was a good fight
Pac-Clottey was decent/okay
Pac-Margarito was crap
Pac-Mosley was crap
Pac-JMM was crap going into it
Pac-Bradley is a very good fight
Comment
Comment