problem is that you sub for te months in between unless yu're a broke loser and turn it off after each big fight. so really it's not 10 twice a year, it's 120 for the entire year.
problem is that you sub for te months in between unless yu're a broke loser and turn it off after each big fight. so really it's not 10 twice a year, it's 120 for the entire year.
You are a weirdo. Everytime you quote you your'e saying weird **** that makes no sense. When I see it's you I think to myself 'wtf is this weirdo talking about now'
No it wouldn't cost 10x as much. It would cost 7.5x as much on PPV. Stop listening to Hearn's BS please. He keeps mentioning $100 US PPVs as if those happen all the time. Only have happened twice and they were the two biggest PPVs of all time (Floyd vs Pac/McGregor).
I mean the main point is the fight would be costing a lot more if it was on PPV and not DAZN. And that's all that matters here. The other crap of $100 is unnecessary.
Damn homie, you mad. It would actually cost $85, not $75 as you claim or 100 as the other said. Both of ya *****es wrong.
problem is that you sub for te months in between unless yu're a broke loser and turn it off after each big fight. so really it's not 10 twice a year, it's 120 for the entire year.
Its 10 dollars. Then 10 dollars for his September fight. Then 10 dollas for HD archived fights and other fights on DAZN throughout the year.
Damn homie, you mad. It would actually cost $85, not $75 as you claim or 100 as the other said. Both of ya *****es wrong.
No, I'm not. Only $85 was for GGG/Canelo II. That's it. All others have been $75 or lower.
And nothing to be mad about, pointing out the truth. The main point is valid, we will be saving good money getting this on DAZN opposed to PPV. But just wouldn't be 10x as much.
Comment