Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rate from 1-10. GGGs win over (washed up?) Daniel Geale

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rate from 1-10. GGGs win over (washed up?) Daniel Geale

    How do you rate this GGG win?

    Is this a signature win for GGG?

    Did Daniel Geale's age affect the outcome of this fight?

    State your reason.
    33
    1
    6.06%
    2
    2
    6.06%
    2
    3
    12.12%
    4
    4
    21.21%
    7
    5
    3.03%
    1
    6
    12.12%
    4
    7
    12.12%
    4
    8
    3.03%
    1
    9
    3.03%
    1
    10
    21.21%
    7

  • #2
    I actually LOL.

    Comment


    • #3
      10 because who gives a ****

      Comment


      • #4
        LOL someone voted 10. Clearly got triggered.

        Should've made the voting public, that definitely changes what people put.

        EDIT: Oh I see, carry on then Diegosome1

        Comment


        • #5
          I think him not being very good effected him more to be honest

          Comment


          • #6
            The win itself was fine and I don't think GG did anything wrong. But, I was never sold on Geale being anything special. I don't understand why people speak of him as if he was a legend at some point.

            I'll give it a 6/10, only because Golovkin looked great.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Redd Foxx View Post
              The win itself was fine and I don't think GG did anything wrong. But, I was never sold on Geale being anything special. I don't understand why people speak of him as if he was a legend at some point.

              I'll give it a 6/10, only because Golovkin looked great.
              Seems fair to me

              Comment


              • #8
                6ish. Geale was legitimately better than most people think of him. He got drained by Cotto, legitimately struggled making weight and got knocked out. After that, as it always happens, he moved up in weight.

                But he was actually a good fighter, solid B.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I gave it a 5. Geale wasn't much of a fighter and GGG took him out about as quickly and easily as it is possible to do. He gets a 1 for the quality of his opponent and a 10 for the way he beat him so it averages out about a 5. For some reason Geale was ranked higher than he should have been. Geale was still ranked higher than he should have been when Cotto defended his title against him.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Redd Foxx View Post
                    The win itself was fine and I don't think GG did anything wrong. But, I was never sold on Geale being anything special. I don't understand why people speak of him as if he was a legend at some point.

                    I'll give it a 6/10, only because Golovkin looked great.
                    Yea, about the same for me.

                    Won't vote because 'wraps is above bait polls.

                    Like you, I never thought of Geale as anything more than another fighter in the division. That's not hate or criticism though, that's pure ignorance. Like Whyte and most other euro fighters that haven't caught my eye like Tyson Fury did, I just don't know the fighters over there too well. The time difference makes it so that I really need to dig to see those fights, and I don't put forth that kind of effort, with that time lol.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP