he put in a great performance and i thought he won clearly in a fight where lots of people thought he was going to lose. But golovkin goes by a different criteria to every other fighter on here, if he doesnt ko them hes been exposed and deserves to lose apparantly.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Despite this being a very close fight one thing is clear Golovkin was overatted
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by nubianpiye View Postwho said Golovkins jabs were weak? they weren't why are you making a big deal about the use of lateral movement? is it not a part of boxing? Lateral movement to set traps and reset is not running.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vlad_ View PostI'm not saying Canelo didn't have his moments, but GGG was the one coming forward throwing the harder shots, and outlanding Canelo basically 2 to 1. He is also 35. Not an excuse, simply a reality.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Ganstaz003 View PostHe has clearly been the best middleweight of his era and the past decade. So ultimately, that's the only objective thing we can verify. Things like ATG an being the best ever are all totally subjective because how are you going to objectively compare boxers from totally different eras and rank them? So as far as I'm concerned, being the best of one's own era is sufficient enough to be classified as an ATG.
Also, ANY boxer will look inferior against better quality opposition than lesser quality opposition. So GGG might have not looked AS good whilst stepping up, but neither have any of the past ATG's when they also stepped up most of the time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sledgeweather17 View PostPretty sure Floyd made most of his top opposition look mediocre, Canelo included, who boxed GGG's ears off today.
Canelo was at his peak, at age 27 against a boxer who is past his best at age 35 and still looked to have inferior conditioning, fitness, stamina and effectiveness. So no, I don't see how he boxed GGG's ears off.
Comment
Comment