Floyd isnt TBE?? Despite PERFECT record/QUALITY resume??TBE past present and FUTURE!

[TonyGe]

Floyd is TBE (the best ever) and the combination of his PERFECT record of 49-0 AND QUALITY of resume is xxxx hands down xxxx GREATEST OF ALL TIME.


Once he beats McGuzzler he will officially break Marciano record and retire undefeated. But Marciano faced majority bums and taxi cab drivers.

Floyd is the GREATEST in history.



Doesn't look like anyone will challenge FLOYDS GREATNESS in the near future either.

Fighters like LLoma and LLL are good but one has a mediocre record of 9-1 and the other fights little guys and Uber drivers. Both struggle vs decent opposition.


They are good but not PERFECT.


FACTS.


**** you if you don't like it.

Do some research into longest winning streaks. Retiring undefeated is unusual. Winning 49 fights in a row is outstanding but there are far longer winning streaks. Mayweather is a great fighter but The Best Ever that's something he came up with for self promotion.

[Real King Kong]

You don't agree FLOYD MAYWEATHER JR WAS THE BEST EVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE SPORT?

You may have been subconsciously influenced by the haters on this site.
That's the problem with the internet....every idiot now has a voice.


Objectively speaking on my opinion..... Numbers don't lie.




Smh.


Stay strong Bro.

[Larry the boss]

There's 2x the belts then back then. This is a bul**** statistic that doesn't mean a thing.

So name the current fighters who have defeated ore champions...and to be honest Mayweather only fought for the WBC title most of his career

[hugh grant]

He is clearly THE best of this era....

Jmm said PAC is without doubt the best of this era.

So name the current fighters who have defeated ore champions...and to be honest Mayweather only fought for the WBC title most of his career

Floyd fights berto rather than brook or Thurman. So beating champions doesn't mean you are taking toughest fights. That statistic means nothing. The only person it means anythin g to is Floyd so he could boast about it.
But it means nothing to anyone worthwhile. !Floyd fans aren't worthwhile

[mathed]

Floyd is TBE (the best ever) and the combination of his PERFECT record of 49-0 AND QUALITY of resume is xxxx hands down xxxx GREATEST OF ALL TIME.


Once he beats McGuzzler he will officially break Marciano record and retire undefeated. But Marciano faced majority bums and taxi cab drivers.

Floyd is the GREATEST in history.


Doesn't look like anyone will challenge FLOYDS GREATNESS in the near future either.

Fighters like LLoma and LLL are good but one has a mediocre record of 9-1 and the other fights little guys and Uber drivers. Both struggle vs decent opposition.


They are good but not PERFECT.


FACTS.


**** you if you don't like it.

[Dosumpthin]

Jmm said PAC is without doubt the best of this era.



Floyd fights berto rather than brook or Thurman. So beating champions doesn't mean you are taking toughest fights. That statistic means nothing. The only person it means anythin g to is Floyd so he could boast about it.
But it means nothing to anyone worthwhile. !Floyd fans aren't worthwhile

And here it is. PACkwards logic at its finest.


What's a good Floyd thread without pact@rd extremist logic?




You know what's sad? Nevermind PAC actually lost to Floyd.


What's sad is Andre Berto would be a step up in competition compared to Pacquiaos recent opponents.


Smh.

[Ryn0]

who has defeated more world champions then Floyd?

I get your point, and Floyd is one of the best ever no doubt. But that's a false statistic because you essentially rule out every fighter before the invention of the four belts so 1988 even if you don't count the WBO/IBF (and that slims his list) and go back to say WBA every fighter before 1962 is discounted.

Even though Floyd mostly fought for the WBC, the other champions held different belts to become champions. Corrales was the IBF champ for example

[GhostofDempsey]

Research for me? YOU were the one who posted FALSE information under the pretense labled as FACT.

I called you out on it. Instead of providing factual proof you tucked your tail an hid.



So this is your only factual proof Floyd used PEDS? An IV of vitamins?

Nevermind the years of ABP testing, CIR testing every sample and even providing a partial urine sample before the IV......

The FACT here is that he was granted a THERAPUTIC USE EXEMPTION that was well within WADA RULES.




This is where you are exposed.

It doesn't take much effort to convince people of the truth when you present FACTS - Which you FAILED to do.


In a previous thread you clearly stated A MISINFORMED RUMOR AS A FACT.


Well it does take a lot more effort to convince someone to change their opinion of FACTS when you are known to not only present FALSE information but also to not admit when you were wrong about it.


Look how hard that idiot Spoon works to try and "convince" people Manny beat Floyd. Watch any of the videos and they lack factual information - improperly counting/dismissing punches in favor of Manny and even trying to redfine how boxing matches are judged.







Yet there isn't another boxer alive that can surpass Floyd's accomplishments inside the ring.

FACT.

You are a lost and hopeless cause. You are also an alt for TravestyinNY. I know this because I handed you your ass in our last tussle and now you are ignoring everyone else's strong points and replies and dedicating way too much time trying to break down mine. Same way you fight endlessly with Spoon on the Floyd/Pac investigation thread.

It doesn't matter that he got an exception three weeks later, at the time he WAS doing something that was unauthorized. This is why he chooses USADA over VADA. This is why he only fights in Vegas under the protection of the corrupt NSAC. Where there's smoke there is fire, and that IV was telling.

A fighter of Mayweather's pedigree and experience (and one who claims he fights only a few pound within his walking around weight) doesn't allow himself to be dehydrated right before the biggest fight of his career. GTFO with that nonsense! He was flushing something from his system.

I'm not blinded so badly by bias that I think Manny won the fight, he did not. But there are two schools of thought concerning his shoulder. He could have postponed the fight to get surgery and come back 100%, but in all likelihood the fight would have been cancelled and never rescheduled. Floyd and his fangirls would have said Manny was ducking him. Considering the time and labor involved in making that fight, it would never have happened if Manny postponed for an injury. So he went in fighting with one good arm, and "the best ever" couldn't even finish a faded, one-armed Pac inside the distance. Instead he ran and clinched and stunk the place up.

For you to think that Floyd should be placed ahead of Robinson, Pep, Duran, Moore, and dozens of other ATGs speaks to your ignorance and blind loyalty.

[Dosumpthin]

I get your point, and Floyd is one of the best ever no doubt. But that's a false statistic because you essentially rule out every fighter before the invention of the four belts so 1988 even if you don't count the WBO/IBF (and that slims his list) and go back to say WBA every fighter before 1962 is discounted.

Even though Floyd mostly fought for the WBC, the other champions held different belts to become champions. Corrales was the IBF champ for example

Welcome to boxing in the 21st century.

Where the pool of talented fighters has increased substantially since the early 1800's.


Boxing is now a "profession" and no longer a hobby for cab drivers and steel workers to earn extra shinny nickles.


Fighters train 24/7 in state of the art facilities to compete against other opponents from around the world.



You ever wonder WHY they initially created more belts?



Either way, FLOYD still has remained undfeated throughout one of the deepest most skilled resumes in history.


Whether or not you want to acknowledge belts still doesn't change that fact.



TBE.

[Larry the boss]

Jmm said PAC is without doubt the best of this era.



Floyd fights berto rather than brook or Thurman. So beating champions doesn't mean you are taking toughest fights. That statistic means nothing. The only person it means anythin g to is Floyd so he could boast about it.
But it means nothing to anyone worthwhile. !Floyd fans aren't worthwhile

and mannys own damn trainer said floyd was the best of this era