Originally posted by PunchyPotorff
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Gonzalez: Canelo is NOT The Best - Until He Beats Golovkin!
Collapse
-
Originally posted by bambam182 View Postif canelo fought the same guys GGG has, he would also be unbeaten and his KO would be higher.
ok, so back to my question. who has GGG beaten that makes him the best? canelo beat lara and trout when all you fa9s on here were saying he was ducking ducking ducking ducking them? remember? or did everyone forget that since the ginger proved you guys wrong?
canelo has at least fought A level fighters, may, cotto, lara according to some of you. name 1 A level fighter GGG has fought? you cant therefore he isnt the best. WIlder has a better resume then GGG.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bambam182 View Postof course, he has KO'd C level fighters. you guys said he was ducking trout and lara, and he fought and beat both. didnt lara call out GGG but you guys say lara priced himself out, yet GGG price himself out with canelo ROFL.
stupid idiots.
you guys said he was ducking trout and lara, he fights them and beats them but he still doesnt get credit. pathetic fans.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bambam182 View Postwilder and GGG have both fought nobodies but he has a higher KO percent. the KO percent is what all the GGG fans claim makes GGG better than canelo.
Comment
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by PunchyPotorff View Post
Same could be said of GGG. Only difference.... substitute names Wade, Rubio, Monroe etc etc.
Originally posted by JUNIABOY View PostActually, the real difference is that GGG fights his mandatory.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JUNIABOY View PostYou can't compare the KO percentages of a heavyweight to a middleweight. Go look at the KO percentages of all heavyweights. It's basically the only way you win at heavyweight. GGG's KO streak is much more impressive because he's doing it at f#ckin middleweight. Do you even understand that?!
Comment
-
Originally posted by PunchyPotorff View PostQuote:
Originally Posted by PunchyPotorff View Post
Same could be said of GGG. Only difference.... substitute names Wade, Rubio, Monroe etc etc.
'Mandatory' doesn't really mean a lot these days. Certainly doesn't often mean the toughest challenge. Weren't Wade and Rubio 2 of GGG's mandatories? Maybe even Monroe as well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bambam182 View Postoh i forgot, against C level opposition. do you understand that?
Comment
-
Originally posted by JUNIABOY View PostYou can't compare the KO percentages of a heavyweight to a middleweight. Go look at the KO percentages of all heavyweights. It's basically the only way you win at heavyweight. GGG's KO streak is much more impressive because he's doing it at f#ckin middleweight. Do you even understand that?!
He is not even able to differentiate between a guy who ducks all the biggest challenges to a guy who is the most feared fighter on the planet and has Mexican Warriors drop their belt in fear.
He also shows that he is very simpleminded and has no idea about the sport, he probably doesnt know shit.
Boxrec makes it easy for you and gauges an opponents quality.
If 2 great fighters fight each other its a 5 star fight, A and B Class = 4 Star, A and C = 3 Star, A vs D = 2 Star, A vs bum = 1 Star.
Wilder has a much much much worse resume than GGG, he didnt fight one better opponent than GGG in his entire career on a fight to fight basis.
When you compare their last 17 opponents, 16 of GGGs opponents were ranked higher than Wilders. Only 1 opponent was ranked equal.
I rather let facts speak for themselves.
Comment
Comment