Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I never realised Crawford's reach is 74'

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Reach is overrated in my opinion. Gamboa had a 65 reach was still able to get inside crawford’s reach advantage.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by GrandpaBernard View Post
      I think it's a typo error

      All Crawford's tales of the tape list his reach at 70"


      That makes more sense.

      McGreggor had 74" reach, Crawfords arms dont seem as long as mcgreggors.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by travestyny View Post
        I just mentioned the same thing today. 2" more than Mayweather and Spence. Crazy.
        5' 9"
        Kell Brook: 69" reach
        Yordenis Ugas: 69" reach
        Jeff Horn: 68"reach

        5' 8"
        Amir Khan: 71" reach
        Danny Garcia: 68" reach

        5' 7"
        Keith Thurman: 69" reach

        5' 6"
        Porter: 69" reach
        Mikey Garcia: 68" reach
        Pacquiao: 67" reach

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Brz_Pugilist View Post
          Reach is overrated in my opinion. Gamboa had a 65 reach was still able to get inside crawford’s reach advantage.

          It varies but it is a definite advantage or even necessity for an outside fighter.

          Fury with his height and reach almost no heavy can even find his head.

          Sure some guys with T rex arms like Hatton and Tyson were effective but a long reach is almost always a big advantage. You can have a long reach and still have good inside game. Floyd, lennox and hopkins all had great inside and outside game and a long reach.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Brz_Pugilist View Post
            Reach is overrated in my opinion. Gamboa had a 65 reach was still able to get inside crawford’s reach advantage.
            It absolutely isn't overrated. I mean can you get inside a longer reach? That goes without saying, but a fighter with Crawford's type of skill set can dictate the entire fight with his arm length/reach. He can keep you at bay and just pick you off.

            Gamboa had quicker hands than Crawford but after the 4th round, proceeded to get his a$$ whooped.

            Comment


            • #16
              This guy should leave Arum. He will waste his prime years fighting nobodies. He has the skill to beat everyone at WW. He's now what? 31? His resume is sh#tty for a top P4P fighter with that kind of skills.

              Comment


              • #17
                That is a hell of an asset if a fighter can utilize it well.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by el*** View Post
                  That makes more sense.

                  McGreggor had 74" reach, Crawfords arms dont seem as long as mcgreggors.
                  exactly

                  Originally posted by el*** View Post
                  It varies but it is a definite advantage or even necessity for an outside fighter.

                  Fury with his height and reach almost no heavy can even find his head.

                  Sure some guys with T rex arms like Hatton and Tyson were effective but a long reach is almost always a big advantage. You can have a long reach and still have good inside game. Floyd, lennox and hopkins all had great inside and outside game and a long reach.
                  yep I rather have long arms and learn how to fight inside than t-rex arms learning how to box outside

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP