But that was after his power source was taken away.
Doesnt that apply to Manny also? He was ko'ing everybody > then he started drug testing and NO MORE KO'S until he fought in MALAYSIA under a less than average if, any drug testing, then mysteriously his power returned vs Matthysse.
Doesnt that apply to Manny also? He was ko'ing everybody > then he started drug testing and NO MORE KO'S until he fought in MALAYSIA under a less than average if, any drug testing, then mysteriously his power returned vs Matthysse.
Manny Pedquiao is a legend so he can shoot up as much as he wants.
...assuming each fighter has to fight all the fighters at the opposing team, at their primes, which team racks up the most wins and why.
I have never liked the concept of a generation although I think I understand the meaning. The term is so vague. When does a generation start and end? Is it every 20 years or every 25 years or what. There is so much overlap with boxers constantly coming and going. For instance how is Bradley from an older generation when he is only about 4 years older than some guys in the so called new generation? From the fighters you listed I'll go with the older generation. Prime against prime I think Spence and Crawford are great and have a chance to beat anybody at 147. Guys like Vargas, Garcia and Porter don't have a chance in hell to beat prime Mayweather, Mosley or Pacquiao and a slim chance to beat a prime Cotto, Margarito or even Bradley in my opinion. The older generation racks up the most wins because overall they were better.
the top 3 fighters havent fought each other in the division and dont seem to have inclination to soon either. that tells you the difference between the two eras.
Did you not see what Thurman did to Guerrero? And you know Porter has fought Berto (actually, you probably don't)?
Berto been washed up for 5 years..?
We wont agree because I honestly believe these WWs today are below average. The 2 good WWs - TC and Spence - would perform respectfully, but the rest are horrible.
Comment