Originally posted by Curt Henning
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
If Canelo bests Jacobs in a close competitive fight
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Curt Henning View Postdont u think its fair, though, to give canelo more credit for this fight than giving golovkin for his fight with jacobs?
i mean...facts are that canelo already had compiled a better resume at age 27 than golovkin....even before canelo fought golovkin twice he had a better resume than golovkin....now consider canelos age....the fact that golovkin was considered, at worst, a top 3 p4p guy...unbeaten.....and he fought him twice and is now taking on jacobs....
we cant assume everything is even....this fight just adds more meat/beef(lol get it) to canelos already impressive resume....for golovkin it was the first hole punched on a very thin one
Comment
-
Originally posted by boliodogs View PostSo by your strange twisted Canelo loving GGG hating logic Canelo should get more credit than GGG for beating Jacobs than GGG who beat a younger bigger better Jacobs than Canelo will fight. You are fuking unbelievable. I love both GGG and Canelo. GGG isn't Mr. bumbeater and Canelo isn't Mr. perfect boxer.
Comment
-
-
I'm torn on the answer. Obviously the bigger slightly younger Jacobs is a tougher out but Jacobs at 170 is a very respectable win. Certainly Canelo will deserve props for winning, if he does, but flexing his A-side muscle again to gain an advantage grates on me somewhat.
Comment
-
Originally posted by boliodogs View PostSo by your strange twisted Canelo loving GGG hating logic Canelo should get more credit than GGG for beating Jacobs than GGG who beat a younger bigger better Jacobs than Canelo will fight. You are fuking unbelievable. I love both GGG and Canelo. GGG isn't Mr. bumbeater and Canelo isn't Mr. perfect boxer.
its just common sense...jacobs added to canelos resume just adds to an already impressive one....for golovkin is what the first real notch on his.....and compare ages and overall resumes? not even close
you are just as bad with the felating of golovkin....just once try to face reality...you got sold on golovkin and hes not what you bought...hes a good fighter...but hes not great....his resume is not good at all either
you wanna tell me u think he beat canelo the first time? ill listen......you wanna tell me he beat him the 2nd time? ill laugh....you try to tell me golovkin won easily either time? ill look at u as a nut guzzling groupie....its just so far from reality....but then again thats where you gggroupies live
im not saying "oh if canelo wins we have to give more credit to canelo than we did golovkin"....im saying look at age...overall career and resume.....a win over jacobs will do more for canelos resume and standing than it did for golovkins in the long run
Comment
-
Originally posted by SniXSniPe View PostHis logic is incredibly stupid, but this is NSB we are talking about. The posters here are either trolls, closet racists, and/or go scorched earth policy as soon as someone threatens their favorite fighter.
who is younger? who has the better resume right now?
canelo....easily.....so adding jacobs to it only adds more meat to canelos resume.....jacobs was the first real test on golovkins......its simple really
im not saying give canelo more credit if he wins...im saying it does more to beef up canelos already impressive resume.....and canelo is only 28.....where jacobs was the first decent test on golovkins into his 30s
Comment
Comment