You think? she was a bull, fought angry and Correia had nothing for her apart from one left hand that connected that Rousey walked through.
I just mean that she was wreckless. She got what she wanted but gambled by trying to just brawl. No real defence.
With those little gloves there seems a greater chance of being KO'd.
Majority of these women just haven't dedicated the same time to fighting and martial arts as Ronda.
Holly Holm is the only bantam that I believe will present a danger to Ronda. Because Holly has put in WORK for YEARS. Check her resume.
Her weakness is Rondas strength. Time and time again, these elite level strikers in kickboxing get starched in MMA simply because of the grappling factor they have to be worried about, the distance management and the gloves are small so you can't adopt an Alistair Overeem K1-esque guard to absorb punishment.
She hasn't looked anything special as of late, she is also past her athletic prime AND the UFC are REALLY overrating her standup. She has the edge on the feet but Ronda is VERY well-rounded in comparison, just less holes in her game man versus the best that counts A LOT. It's not going to be a Diaz-Cerrone kind of fight.
I just mean that she was wreckless. She got what she wanted but gambled by trying to just brawl. No real defence.
With those little gloves there seems a greater chance of being KO'd.
Yeah she was reckless, showed no respect to her opponent whatsoever.
Women's mma is watchable imo, the Tate fight was decent the previous week too, she ate some bombs. When they start all that hugging on the ground you at least have the consolation that it's two women rolling around.
I just mean that she was wreckless. She got what she wanted but gambled by trying to just brawl. No real defence.
With those little gloves there seems a greater chance of being KO'd.
Comment