Originally posted by mickey malone
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
did any of you enjoy hagler duran match?
Collapse
-
-
A different take...
I posted on this thread before, but from a different perspective.
Today's take: The fight - to use the broadest of terms - was a tactical bore and more of chess match that a boxing match, neither man's finest hour, although to the victor went the spoils...
Yawn.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rightsideup View Postjust to add to the last two posts haggler's physical abilities such as speed and reflex's were much higher level against Duran than the Leonard fight and Duran made no demands about the length of the bout.Originally posted by Anthony342 View PostLeonard felt that way as well, as he was in attendance for that fight and right after it, decided he would finally fight Hagler, as he felt Hagler declined enough for him to be able to beat him.
Panamaniac, you're right: but that's also why it was so compelling. Brilliance from two legends. Sometimes, chess matches, fighters so cleaver they make it tremendously difficult to fight them, make for appearently dull fights. But in my opinion, in this case you also have to appreciate the context and the significance...
Comment
-
Originally posted by rightsideup View PostI maybe in the minority but I was looking forward to a rematch. I thought it was a good match between to crafty professionals and would have enjoyed seeing them go at it again. I also would have liked to see marvin give tommy a rematch again but for different reasons.
Comment
Comment