Why are there so many media outlets and fans that saw the fight for GGG?

[Gigantes]

Seems like no one can answer this, (especially that idiot Bobby) but why is there so many media outlets that saw it for GGG and only 27 boxers (can we even count those, I mean majority of those ARE Mexican) that saw it for Canelo? (I don't even need to bring up out of 6 "judges" only 1 had GGG winning out of 2 fights)

Harold Lederman (HBO Sports): 116-112 Golovkin

Brian Campbell (CBS sports): 116-112 Golovkin

Dan Rafael (ESPN): 114-114 draw

Stephen A. Smith (ESPN): Golovkin won

Arash Markazi (ESPN): 114-114 draw

Brett Okamoto (ESPN): 114-114 draw

Teddy Atlas - Golovkin won

Salvador Rodríguez (ESPN Mexico): 114-114 draw

Jorge Eduardo Sánchez (ESPN Deportes): 114-114 draw

David Faitelson (ESPN Deportes): Golovkin won

Eduardo Lamazón (Televisa): 116-112 Golovkin

Gareth A Davies (The Telegraph): 116-112 Golovkin

Josh Peter (USA Today): 115-113 Golovkin

Sports Illustrated: 114-114 draw

Skip Bayless (Fox Sports 1): Golovkin won

Dylan Hernandez (LA Times): 115-113 Golovkin

Lance Pugmire (LA Times): 114-114 draw

BoxingScene: 114-114 draw

Chris Mannix (Yahoo! Sports): 115-113 Golovkin

Kevin Iole (Yahoo! Sports): 114-114 draw

The Guardian: 116-112 Golovkin

Joe DePaolo (Washington Post): 115-113 Golovkin

Mike Coppinger (Ring Magazine): 114-114 draw

Douglass Fischer (Ring Magazine): 114-114 draw

Mike Baca II (Ring Magazine and Undisputed Champion Network): 115-113 Golovkin

Mike Costello (BBC): 115-113 Golovkin

Steve Bunce (BBC): 114-114 draw

Al Bernstein (Showtime Sports): Golovkin won

Barry Jones (BT Sport): 116-112 Golovkin

Sherdog.com: 116-112 Golovkin

Jai Bednall (news.com.au): 115-113 Golovkin

Brian Mazique (Forbes): 114-114 draw

Adam Abramowitz (Ring Magazine and SN Boxing): 115-113 Golovkin

Tom Craze (Bad Left Hook): 116-112 Golovkin

Fraser Coffeen (Bloody Elbow): 115-113 Golovkin

Anton Tabuena (Bloody Elbow): 115-113 Golovkin

The Associated Press: 114-114 draw

Adam Caparell (Complex Sports): 116-112 Golovkin

Bill Simmons (HBO and The Ringer): 114-114 draw

Steven Muehlhausen (Sporting News): 116-112 Golovkin

Andreas Hale (Sporting News): Golovkin won

Graham Houston (Boxing Monthly): Canelo won

Michael Montero (MonteroOnBoxing): 115-113 Golovkin

Matt Christie (Boxing News): 115-114 Golovkin

George Willis (New York Post): 114-114 draw

Gary Melo (SportsNet Canada): Golovkin won

Below The Belt Podcast: 115-113 Golovkin

World Boxing News: 115-113 Golovkin

Jeff Powell (Daily Mail): 116-113 Golovkin

Marcos Villegas (Fight Hub TV): 114-114 draw

Michelle Rosado (Raging Babe): 115-113 Canelo

Michelle Joy Phelps (Behind the Gloves): 115-113 Golovkin

Lennox Lewis: Golovkin won by 2 rounds

Fight Nights: 115-113 Golovkin

Michael Woods (NYFights.com): two point edge for Golovkin

Dieter Kurtenbach (San Jose Mercury News and the East Bay Times): Golovkin won by 3 rounds

Rafael G (the Fight City): 116-112 Golovkin

Jesse Granger (Las Vegas Sun): 115-113 Golovkin

Jerry Izenberg (The NJ Advance Media): 115-113 Golovkin

40 for GGG, 2 for Canelo, 17 Draw

average fan scorecard (1773 fans): 116-113 Golovkin

lmao "raging babe"

[Eff Pandas]

Well fans are followers largely & HBO had it 8-4 GGG so that could explain their take.

And I heard the media had seats further back then they typically do for this card. Brian Campbell mentioned that on a podcast I listen to & that kinda made me go hmmmmm cuz I thought it was weird the media was overly GGG's way & boxers were more split with a lean towards GGG since usually when the media sees it more one way boxers do to or thats seemed to be the case to me.

None of that changes the fact the fight was super f#cking close & even with the disputed decision its nowhere close to being controversial cuz of all the close rounds & thats the things a small minority of people are having trouble with it appears to me.

[Real King Kong]

Cuz they all dksab...not compared to some random couch potato nsb poster anyway.

[pasawayako]

GGG beat canelo ass.

[boliodogs]

I don't think many fans are influenced that much by the commentary. Any fan serious enough to fill out a scorecard is serious enough to decide for themselves. The majority had GGG winning by 2 or 3 points because he did. You can never prove it one way or the other. They are great fighters fairly evenly matched and all rounds were fast and furious with good punches landed by both men. The only way GGG can win on points is to win big. They won't let him beat Canelo by 2 or 3 points. 1773 fans having an average score card of 116 to 113 for GGG tells you what most viewers thought.

[bigdunny1]

Why so many fighters and trainers saw fight for canelo?

So

]

[Gigantes]

Why so many fighters and trainers saw fight for canelo?

That's not the question I'm asking here am I you idiot.

Go make a thread with that question if you want an answer.

lmao dun made a list in paint and acting like it's a legit source.

so a few boxers said canelo won, good for them, it's still no where near as many as media outlets/fans.

nice try though, idiot.

[Gigantes]

I don't think many fans are influenced that much by the commentary. Any fan serious enough to fill out a scorecard is serious enough to decide for themselves. The majority had GGG winning by 2 or 3 points because he did. You can never prove it one way or the other. They are great fighters fairly evenly matched and all rounds were fast and furious with good punches landed by both men. The only way GGG can win on points is to win big. They won't let him beat Canelo by 2 or 3 points. 1773 fans having an average score card of 116 to 113 for GGG tells you what most viewers thought.

nice post, says got to spread green k to others before I can for boliodogs again lol

[Just looking]

Because Golovkin won

[jcj0427]

Because Golovkin won

Couldnt have said it better myself. And he also got robbed the first fight. lets not forget that.