Login or Sign Up
Logging in...
Remember me
Log in
Forgot password or user name?
or
Sign Up
Log in with
Forums
News
Schedule
Search
New Topics
Today's Posts
Help
Forums
News
Schedule
Search
New Topics
Today's Posts
Help
Forum
Boxing Forums
Non Stop Boxing
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why were late 90s and early 2000s welterweights so short?
Collapse
Sign in or register here to comment
X
Collapse
Posts
Latest Activity
Photos
Sign In / Register
Search
Page
of
2
Filter
Time
All Time
Today
Last Week
Last Month
Show
All
Discussions only
Photos only
Videos only
Links only
Polls only
Events only
Filtered by:
Clear All
new posts
Previous
1
2
template
Next
dibzvincent143
Undisputed Champion
Join Date:
Mar 2009
Posts:
5189
Points:
1,505
Received
273
Given
148
Share
Tweet
#11
06-28-2019, 01:29 AM
Originally posted by
The Problem
View Post
Pac 5'5, Floyd 5'7. Mosley 5'8. Cotto 5'7
You asked why the 90s wws are short but those dudes were not even welters at that point.
So i thought u’ll give examples on that time frame
Comment
Post
Cancel
OCPancho
Undisputed Champion
Join Date:
Apr 2014
Posts:
2154
Points:
1,446
Received
54
Given
17
Share
Tweet
#12
06-28-2019, 01:39 AM
Originally posted by
dibzvincent143
View Post
You asked why the 90s wws are short but those dudes were not even welters at that point.
So i thought u’ll give examples on that time frame
2009 must have been early 2000's. lol
Comment
Post
Cancel
ramses07
Undisputed Champion
Join Date:
Apr 2011
Posts:
1995
Points:
2,255
Received
224
Given
87
Share
Tweet
#13
06-28-2019, 01:52 AM
Ike, tito, Oscar and Vernon were huge for that weight class
Comment
Post
Cancel
Sign in or register here to comment
Previous
1
2
template
Next
Working...
Yes
No
OK
OK
Cancel
X
TOP
Sign In
USERNAME
PASSWORD
Forgot password?
Remember Me
SIGN IN
Register
Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
JOIN NOW
Tweet
Comment