Right now I think it's fair to say Crawford has a pretty good resume.

[Scopedog]

His resume is okay at best, to be honest. That said, it's not just winning fights against names that matter, it's how you win - and that's why Crawford is in the P4P conversation. His skillset in the ring speaks for itself, there's nobody else out there who has the same kind of accuracy and reflexes while also being a switch hitter with real knockout power out of both stances with either hand.

Of course, however, there are always going to be lingering doubts until he proves himself against the best.

[Godsfly]

People say Crawford has a weak resume. what top fighter right now has a better resume?

It littreally boggles my mind. They say lomachenko has a godly resume but crawford has a **** one? What in the entire hell lolol the guys that they say have amazing resumes when stacked up to crawfords (like loma) isnt even better.......?