Originally posted by The Gambler1981
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do people know what a "Robbery" is?
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View Post10-9 or 9-10 which one do you go for. That is the inherent flaw in boxing judging because that call needs to be made some will go one way and some the other.
and if those monster shots are only good for making sweat fly, bfd.
if monster shots dont phase the guy, 10-9 for the guy who landed more.
Comment
-
Originally posted by John Locke View PostThat wasn't a close fightOriginally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Post97-93 broner is a horrible scorecard...
Comment
-
Originally posted by SemiGreat View Postnot everyone is a banger.
and if those monster shots are only good for making sweat fly, bfd.
if monster shots dont phase the guy, 10-9 for the guy who landed more.
Logically those should not be counted as equal.
But like I said some will like it your way, and others a different way.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View PostIf they make the other guys head move they are easier for judges to see, if the stop the guy in his tracks while the others just bounce off uselessly.
Logically those should not be counted as equal.
But like I said some will like it your way, and others a different way.
tbh, most judges give bangers extra credit for shots landed on arms and shoulders and sloppy aggression.
Comment
-
Originally posted by !WAR MIKEY! View PostPSSSSShhhhhhhhhhhh GTFOH
Granados won.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SemiGreat View Postim giving you every benefit of the doubt but dont say ''soft'' shots are all of a sudden hard to score.
tbh, most judges give bangers extra credit for shots landed on arms and shoulders and sloppy aggression.
Soft shots are harder to score because you don't hear the crack of the shot landing, or see the visible impact. It is why if a guy lands only jabs and the other guy lands fewer shots but all power punches more often than not the guy landing the power shots will win. If the guy does a great jab snapping the guys head with a jab they certainly stand a better chance than a guy landing pawing jabs though.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View PostI am not saying they don't, and I am not saying scoring the strength of shots is any more valid really it is just an alternate way of scoring a fight and if a guy is landing the better shots they should logically count for more.
Soft shots are harder to score because you don't hear the crack of the shot landing, or see the visible impact. It is why if a guy lands only jabs and the other guy lands fewer shots but all power punches more often than not the guy landing the power shots will win. If the guy does a great jab snapping the guys head with a jab they certainly stand a better chance than a guy landing pawing jabs though.
or, like timmy, are flashy but ineffective as sluggers.
all things being equal (all punches are visibly scored), i have to side with quantity over ''quality''. no way to prove a shot is quality if they dont do any harm.
just mho
Comment
Comment