I think alot of Pacquiaos subtle counters were being ignored by the judges

[dibzvincent143]

controlling the tempo is all well and good but at the end of the day its about who landed more clean effective punches on a round by round basis
Pacquiao did this clearly, its not even disputable. As i said before there is no way from a objectionable standpoint Pacquiao lost this fight.

Pac was robbed, end of.

No doubt pacquiao landed the flashier shots on the fight but if you look at the other side of the story you could definitely make a case why horn won. And being the underdog who they believed was gonna get KOed easily can do wonders to their reflection on everything you do on fight night.
On boxnation i was watching a different narrative, with no commentators hugging a fighter nor were they flashing their scorecards.
Other than the 9th round not once did i felt pacquiao was in control, was in command and had horn figured out.
While horn won because of the reasons ive mentioned on my first reply.

Ive only seen the fight once, so i could really be wrong.