Seriously, all this talk about who did win it, but think about this who has had the most success in the last overall decade? I mean he has 2 of 3 controversial losses(JT 1/Calslappy), but talk about someone who has the most names on his resume in the last 10 years, he fought everyone. Trinidad, DLH(younger but bloated), RJJ(super old), undefeated Pavlik, Allen, Joppy, Holmes, Winky, Echols, Tarver. Dude owned the MW/LHW, and controversial loss at SMW. He was dominate for the whole decade, rather that 7 years.
Did he deserve it more than Pacman? I think so he fought prime fighters. More importantly he was way past prime when he fought the majority of these fighters. Does he deserve the nod? I think so, but I'd like the more educated fans to respond, if you are not going to be objective please do not post in this thread. *******s not welcome here, *****s not welcome here. I think PBF is the only fighter with a legitimate case against B-Hop.
Did he deserve it more than Pacman? I think so he fought prime fighters. More importantly he was way past prime when he fought the majority of these fighters. Does he deserve the nod? I think so, but I'd like the more educated fans to respond, if you are not going to be objective please do not post in this thread. *******s not welcome here, *****s not welcome here. I think PBF is the only fighter with a legitimate case against B-Hop.
Comment