I've recently watched the whole 15 rounds of that fight, and to be honest with you, I didn't think Duran dominated Leonard as much as many people are saying that he did. In fact, IMO the fight could have went either way. I actually had Leonard winning the fight by a round! He landed more punches than Duran, and Duran did absolutely nothing in the 15th round. Plus Leonard was the champ and in my eyes Duran didn't "take" the title, especially since he let Leonard win the last round. I had it 144-143 for Leonard. So what do you guys think?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Leonard-Duran I (1980)
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
Originally posted by butterfly1964 View PostI've recently watched the whole 15 rounds of that fight, and to be honest with you, I didn't think Duran dominated Leonard as much as many people are saying that he did. In fact, IMO the fight could have went either way. I actually had Leonard winning the fight by a round! He landed more punches than Duran, and Duran did absolutely nothing in the 15th round. Plus Leonard was the champ and in my eyes Duran didn't "take" the title, especially since he let Leonard win the last round. I had it 144-143 for Leonard. So what do you guys think?
But Duran had moved up from lightweight and was fighting a great welterweight in Leonard.
Also, a fighter doesnt have to 'take' the title away. Boxing is scored fairly on a round-by-round basis. And therefore the old thing about having to do more as a challnger is bull**** and unfair.
Comment
-
-
Butterfly1964:
You seemed to be obsessed with Durán. This is your 2nd thread about him in the same forum. You should get out more...Last edited by Panamaniac; 09-08-2007, 12:53 AM.
Comment
-
-
The fight was originally scored a split decision, later the cards were recalculated and changed to a Unanimous decision.
Duran won fair and square. No one at 147 could have
beat him that night.
Comment
Comment