Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IF Mayweather doesn’t take Pac rematch that means he thinks Pac would beat him

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • IF Mayweather doesn’t take Pac rematch that means he thinks Pac would beat him

    Facts. Otherwise why would he not go and collect an easy 200mil.

    Floyd is a businessman as well as a fighter. He would do anything for money, especially when it’s THAT much money. He doesn’t take risks, he takes sure things.

    If he could get 200mil to fight somebody he knows he would beat, you really think he would not take the fight?

    If he doesn’t take the rematch then he knows pac would beat him. Straight up facts.

  • #2
    An active fighter vs hasnt had a real fight for four years


    Whatever it takes to make floyd lose I suppose 🤣

    Comment


    • #3
      If Pac can't beat a 42 year old Floyd who hasn't fought a professional boxer in over 4 years then he needs to be ashamed of himself.

      It would be embarrassing if Pac lost.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by CHOWWOKKA View Post
        An active fighter vs hasnt had a real fight for four years


        Whatever it takes to make floyd lose I suppose 🤣
        So you agree he would lose then

        Comment


        • #5
          Pacquiao beating a shot Mayweather proves what exactly?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by mcdonalds View Post
            If Pac can't beat a 42 year old Floyd who hasn't fought a professional boxer in over 4 years then he needs to be ashamed of himself.

            It would be embarrassing if Pac lost.
            But Floyd is TBE, greatest ever, I’ve seen plenty of boxers win world titles past 42. He pac so easily apparently in the first fight so he should know how to beat him again no

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Mr Giggles View Post
              But Floyd is TBE, greatest ever, I’ve seen plenty of boxers win world titles past 42. He pac so easily apparently in the first fight so he should know how to beat him again no
              Do you know how long 4 years is?

              Pactrds are dumber than i thought.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Mr Giggles View Post
                But Floyd is TBE, greatest ever, I’ve seen plenty of boxers win world titles past 42. He pac so easily apparently in the first fight so he should know how to beat him again no
                Are you purposely acting stupid? Fighters deteriorate at different speeds. Mayweather looked like **** against McGregor. A win over him now would get zero credit. Only satisfy those that want him to lose his zero.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                  Pacquiao beating a shot Mayweather proves what exactly?
                  It proves he beat a shot retired fighter.
                  Haha!

                  This rematch would be meaningless.
                  Camacho's win over Leonard and Haugen's win over Mancini are worthless.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Mr Giggles View Post
                    So you agree he would lose then
                    Probably yes. It's hard to say cuz we haven't seen him box since Berto.

                    Is that the WIN that you ladyboys so desperately need. A win over a guy who doesnt box boxers? If floyd is even 80% of what he was when he fought manny last time he would still win.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP