Originally posted by USMCer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
If you have no list and no history of the sport, how can you determine a ATG?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by USMCer View PostIf you're a Boxing aficionado...
If you're a Cinephile (movie lover)...
You have a list, whether you have or haven't ever written one down, you must have a list (in your mind, at least).
Comment
-
Originally posted by historian larry View PostFavorite fighter does not=ATG....That is exactly my point..people are just listing their "favorite fighters" with 0 history of the sport
No possible way any of us going to be objective about guys that were active whilst we've been fans, whether they're our favourites or rivals you just can't look at them with the same dispassion you'd view fighters from generations ago. Wait until they're retired, wait until their every opponent is retired, wait until their opponents are all retired and then carry on waiting a few more years I'd say... then make your list.
You gonna give us your list Larry, my man?Last edited by Citizen Koba; 11-09-2019, 03:45 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View PostTS is saying people need an actual top 100 list. Not just a group of fighters you know are great, an actual damn list.
(this is the case, especially so with your basic, "current P4P rankings"... it's an exercise of your own analysis/knowledge/judgement).
Anyway, I digress.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KillaMane26 View PostM-Town Larry!! Question... Whats up with these guys always bringing up Broner every time u make a thread? Its 2019. Its almost like new guys that join NSB receive a brochure of classic threads to troll lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by historian larry View PostThe sport of boxing has been around for centuries but under the Queebsbury rules it has been around over 100, before it was the London prize rules, so if you are not a student of the game how can you come close to saying who is and who isnt an ATG?? You HAVE TO HAVE A LIST WITH KNOWLEDGE TO BACK UP YOUR CLAIMS.
I see thread after thread saying who is and who isnt an ATG yet NONE OF THOSE PEOPLE EVEN HAVE A TOP 100 LIST..If you have no knowledge of that aspect then just stay away from those topics as it is really disrespectful to the sport,
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=831688
You shouldn't give a shit man... dudes on here always gonna get excited about the latest wunderkind or superstar. No one can prove that shit one way or another. Subjective bullcrap.. and really truly, hell does it matter anyway?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View PostThat's not the point i was making. I've obviously seen these movies, but i don't have a list, does that mean i can't discuss them or claim them to be my favourites?
How many boxing fans do you think have a list? How many experts/fighters etc have a list? I'm going to guess not many. There's no reason to have a list unless there's a purpose. Having a list means nothing anyway. Anyone can google a list and switch a few fighters names. Means absolutely nothing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by daggum View Posta great fighter is anyone i want to be great. thats how. for example tank is fightin gamboa next. gamboa is a great fighter. he beat salido who beat loma. these are facts. he therefore must be great. if tank can somehow find a way to win. he beat a great fighter, therefore he must be great. i am the logical boxing fan
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View PostNobody has seen every movie or seen every fighter. People can onlt go on what they've seen or heard. TS probably got butthurt in some thread and is trying to discredit them because they don't have a list. He's stupid like that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by historian larry View PostFavorite fighter does not=ATG....That is exactly my point..people are just listing their "favorite fighters" with 0 history of the sport
Comment
Comment