Why are you guys so high on Diego Corrales?

[boxinghead530]

So orginially you tried to claim that Corrales wasn't P4P top 10 at all.

Now after you've been provided with evidence that he was P4P #5 when Floyd fought him you have come out with this backwards bat**** theory that the P4P list has only counted for the last 10 years.

Bull-****.

Dude if you think there was this huge top 10 p4p emphasis pre-2000, then you dont know ****. Because there was never a huge emphasis on the top 10 as there was who was the p4p number 1 pre-2000 or so.

[Mitchell Kane]

Larry do you know how to comprehend? I said people have only cared about the top 10 p4p for the past ten years or so. Has p4p rankings been around for a long time, of course. But dude you have only started watching boxing since 2006 when Floyd came into your sexual view, so you dont know how the p4p thing used to go down.

About pre-2000 or so fans didnt give a fuk about who was top 10 p4p, they only put emphasis into who was p4p number one. That is fact.

So if there is a p4p top ten ranking around 2000 then those ranking are way more subjective than they are even now and you cant put much cred. into it.

But fuk it Floyd beating Corrales was a great win but dont try and put more into it than what it really is. I bet you think Corrales is a hall of fame great too huh.

How old are you?

[IronDanHamza]

Dude if you think there was this huge top 10 p4p emphasis pre-2000, then you dont know ****. Because there was never a huge emphasis on the top 10 as there was who was the p4p number 1 pre-2000 or so.

No YOU don't know ****.

There is no more emphasis on the P4P list today than there ever has been. You have made that ridiculous claim up and it's not going to run.

It's hilarious that you have even tried to attempt to make this absurd claim.

Corrales was P4P Top 5 then. Fact. You tried to claim he wasn't top 10 P4P. He was. Fact.

[boxinghead530]

No YOU don't know ****.

There is no more emphasis on the P4P list today than there ever has been. You have made that ridiculous claim up and it's not going to run.

It's hilarious that you have even tried to attempt to make this absurd claim.

Corrales was P4P Top 5 then. Fact. You tried to claim he wasn't top 10 P4P. He was. Fact.

Bull****, nowadays its all about who is top 10 p4p and who is not. Back then the emphasis was who is p4p number 1. The top 10 p4p wasnt as emphasized as it is now. Was there rankings on who is top 10 back then, yes but the emphasis wasnt there as much as who was number 1.

That is fact

[boxinghead530]

How old are you?

Put it this way, the amount of years ive followed boxing is older than your age.

[IronDanHamza]

Bull****, nowadays its all about who is top 10 p4p and who is not. Back then the emphasis was who is p4p number 1. The top 10 p4p wasnt as emphasized as it is now. Was there debates as ranking on who is top 10, yes but the emphasis wasnt there as much as who was number 1.

That is fact

No it wasn't. You are talking ****!! Literally pure ****.

The P4P Top 10 has been emphasized for decades. It hasn't been any more emphasized "in the last 10 years" than it ever has.

Why try it? It's never going to work when there are people like myself who have been following boxing before P4P lists even existed.

You tried to claim Corrales wasn't top 10 and when you got proven wrong you've tried to pull this mind boggling claim out of thin air.

Please just stop.

[IronDanHamza]

Put it this way, the amount of years ive followed boxing is older than your age.

Sure it is.

[Mitchell Kane]

Put it this way, the amount of years ive followed boxing is older than your age.

Oh, well if you put it that way I really don't think you're very old.

Started following the sport recently, have you?

[Larry the boss]

Larry do you know how to comprehend? I said people have only cared about the top 10 p4p for the past ten years or so. Has p4p rankings been around for a long time, of course. But dude you have only started watching boxing since 2006 when Floyd came into your sexual view, so you dont know how the p4p thing used to go down.

About pre-2000 or so fans didnt give a fuk about who was top 10 p4p, they only put emphasis into who was p4p number one. That is fact.

So if there is a p4p top ten ranking around 2000 then those ranking are way more subjective than they are even now and you cant put much cred. into it.

But fuk it Floyd beating Corrales was a great win but dont try and put more into it than what it really is. I bet you think Corrales is a hall of fame great too huh.

Dude if you followed boxing back then, then youd know the top 10 p4p ranking wasnt as focus as it is nowadays. Did they have top 10 p4p rankings for years, of course. But dont act like there was this huge emphasis on it back then, because there wasnt. Thats fact

Debates and ranking centered mainly on who was p4p number 1 and the top 10 p4p was more subjective and 1000 times more subjective than it is now.

you owned yourself son..you said Corrales was not top 10 when in fact he was #5..just take your lose and move on

[boxinghead530]

No it wasn't. You are talking ****!! Literally pure ****.

The P4P Top 10 has been emphasized for decades. It hasn't been any more emphasized "in the last 10 years" than it ever has.

Why try it? It's never going to work when there are people like myself who have been following boxing before P4P lists even existed.

You tried to claim Corrales wasn't top 10 and when you got proven wrong you've tried to pull this mind boggling claim out of thin air.

Please just stop.

Dude you are the one talking major bull****. Dude top 10 p4p list pre-2000 was way more subjective and less emphasized than who was just plain number 1 p4p. Thats is fact dude.

Dude dont try and pull this bull**** like you some know it all. Because ive followed boxing religiously since '81. And i know people didnt put much emphasis on who is top 10 p4p.

And yes the top 10 p4p was way more subjective back then than it is now. You know why? ACCESS. People these days have way more access to fighters and who they are and how they fight than back then. That is fact and that the reason why back then a top 10 p4p ranking would be way more subjective.

Try all you want and say top 10 p4p was just a big and just as relevant back then as it is now but that is utter bull****.