Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why isn't Canelo offering himself to make hair testing?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by icha View Post
    honest question here maxi... why do all agencies use urine tests instead of hair??
    honestly im not educated on the topic, but if hair is a much better method, then why do random urine all year when you can do hair tests once or twice before and after the fight..
    The process of hair testing seems to be much more complicated and probably more expensive. Specific lab machines would be needed. It's a whole different process.

    Clenbuterol can be detected in hair with more accuracy than urine. Scientific study:

    Several bodybuilders, all winners of international competitions, were arrested for trafficking of a number of doping agents including anabolic steroids, ephedrine, beta-adrenergics, human chorionic gonadotropin, antidepressants, and diuretics.

    In accordance with the recent French law against doping, the judge asked to test seven bodybuilders to identify doping practices. Hair and urine specimens were collected for analysis. After decontamination, a 100 mg hair strand was pulverized in a ball mill, hydrolyzed, extracted, and derivatized to be tested by GC/MS for anabolic steroids, beta-adrenergic compounds, ephedrine, and other doping agents. Urine was analyzed for anabolic steroids and metabolites, beta-adrenergic compounds, ephedrine, and human chorionic gonadotropin, in addition to a broad spectrum screening with GC/MS.

    The following compounds were detected in urine: ephedrine (29 and 36 ng/ml, n = 2), clenbuterol (0.2 to 0.3 ng/ml, n = 3), norandrosterone (4.7 to 100.7 ng/ml, n = 7), norethiocholanolone (0.9 to 161.8 ng/ml, n = 6), stanozolol (1 to 25.8 ng/ml, n = 4), methenolone (2.5 to 29.7 ng/ml, n = 4), testosterone (3 to 59.6 ng/ml, n = 7), epitestosterone (1 to 20.4 ng/ml, n = 7) and ratio testosterone/epitestosterone n = 6 for four subjects (18.5 to 59.6).

    The following drugs were detected in hair: ephedrine (0.67 and 10.70 ng/mg, n = 2), salbutamol (15 to 31 pg/mg, n = 3), clenbuterol (15 to 122 pg/mg, n = 6), nandrolone (1 to 7.5 pg/mg, n = 3), stanozolol (2 to 84 pg/mg, n = 4), methenolone (17 and 34 ng/ml, n = 2), testosterone enanthate (0.6 to 18.8 ng/mg, n = 5), and testosterone cypionate (3.3 to 4.8 ng/mg, n = 2). These results document the doping practice and demonstrate repetitive exposure to anabolic compounds and confirm the value of hair analysis as a complement to urinalysis in the control of doping practice.
    Source: https://www.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY.../JFS15228J.htm

    In urine tests, 3 of 7 bodybuilders tested positive for Clenbuterol. In hair testing, 6 o 7 tested positive for Clenbuterol.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
      The process of hair testing seems to be much more complicated and probably more expensive. Specific lab machines would be needed. It's a whole different process.

      Clenbuterol can be detected in hair with more accuracy than urine. Scientific study:


      Source: https://www.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY.../JFS15228J.htm

      In urine tests, 3 of 7 bodybuilders tested positive for Clenbuterol. In hair testing, 6 o 7 tested positive for Clenbuterol.
      thanks for the info..
      someone posted before a twitt from conte where he says the test was only $85, so that really doesnt sound expensive at all to me, but not sure, im new to this honestly..

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by icha View Post
        thanks for the info..
        someone posted before a twitt from conte where he says the test was only $85, so that really doesnt sound expensive at all to me, but not sure, im new to this honestly..
        If that's the case then it should be done.

        Comment


        • #24
          No one? where are the GGG haters asking for drug testing?

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
            If that's the case then it should be done.
            yep, i dont see why they are still using urine instead of hair tests for all tests, unless that is still at an early stage or something like that...

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by icha View Post
              honest question here maxi... why do all agencies use urine tests instead of hair??
              honestly im not educated on the topic, but if hair is a much better method, then why do random urine all year when you can do hair tests once or twice before and after the fight..
              Hair is far more accurate but also more expensive so they chooose urine.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Chuckguy View Post
                Hair is far more accurate but also more expensive so they chooose urine.
                any clues on how much is the cost for each(hair and urine)??

                Comment


                • #28
                  Hes afraid Ortiz will take part of the action and show him up !

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    No idea. Canelo and his team have been very quiet in general. There are more things they could have done to prove that he's a clean fighter, instead they're sitting on the sidelines and hoping it all blows over.

                    Suspicious AF for me. It sucks. I was a really big Canelo fan previously, and didn't care who won between him and Golovkin as they're both terrific fighters. Now with Canelo popping dirty and being a lil b1tch about it is very disappointing.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Canelo is a clean fighter, many experts has agreed on this notion and have stated it is tainted meat. Dead issue, dont let it ruin your life.

                      War Canelo

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP