Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Putin Claims U.S. Intelligence Agents Funneled $400 Million To Clinton Campaign

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by travestyny View Post
    You clearly misspoke. Why would the U.S. believe a former KGB agent, turned dictator?

    I already mentioned to Ghost about his deflecting tactic. Be prepared for him to just deflect some more instead of listening to what you stated so perfectly to him! As usual, you are right on point!
    You have yet to contribute anything more than cheerleading to this thread. As usual you have posted nothing of substance. Just more childish taunts and playing follow the leader while everyone else puts in the work. You can go now.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Dr.Cool View Post
      So China hacked into the DNC and RNC databases? Did they hack and leak emails from a top aid to a presidential candidate? Did China hack into 21 state voter databases? Did China hack into U.S. utility companies? Did China have a full time team spreading disinformation? Did China pay for myriad political ads?


      So China did none of that. Again, you simply deflect. What China has done does not even begin to compare to what Russia has done.

      That is from the Republicans in the House and Republicans in the Senate, and all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies. That Russia launched an unprecedented attack on the U.S. election system.

      So, again, when has China done any of this???? What did China do to try and influence or interfere with our elections???
      LOL Show me proof Russians did any of this.
      So China hacked into the DNC and RNC databases? Did they hack and leak emails from a top aid to a presidential candidate? Did China hack into 21 state voter databases? Did China hack into U.S. utility companies? Did China have a full time team spreading disinformation? Did China pay for myriad political ads?
      https://www.cnbc.com/video/2018/02/1...-impacted.html
      Deputy AG Rosenstein: No evidence election results were impacted

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
        What this article fails to report is that Frank Giustra, the CEO of Uranium One, had another mining company in 2005 called UrAsia Energy Ltd. In 2006, Giustra and Bill Clinton went on a trip to several countries on behalf of the Clinton Foundation. One of the stops was Kazakhstan where Giustra met with their president to negotiate a deal with its state-owned mining company. The next day the deal was announced and UrAsia Energy Ltd bought the country's entire uranium rights for $45 million. Kazakhstan held the rights to 20% of the world's uranium supply. A year later in 2007, Uranium One bought out UrAsia Energy Ltd and Giustra became its CEO and two years after that, Rosatom began its acquisition of Uranium One buying a 17% stake in the company.

        Ian Telfer is another Uranium One investor who donated between $1.3 million and $5.6 million to the Clinton foundation.

        Put in may have overshot on the amount, or maybe showed his hand too soon, but the fact remains there were tens of millions of dollars by Uranium One investors who donated to the Clinton Foundation. Try deflecting that.

        I doubt very much you placed a call to anyone. You prefer to cherry pick your sources like most loyal liberals.
        No, you can call Senator Portman tomorrow and ask.

        And again, you have no source. Where is this info from, some chat room???
        Also the Clinton's were not responsible for the Uranium deal, as has been heavily reported.

        You can actually call any Senator or Congressman you want. Go ahead and call Senator Portman. Any office. Though, no one ever answers at his D.C. or Toledo office. Toledo office might not be staffed, but the D.C. office just doesn't answer. EVER. But go ahead and call and ask if the pee tape is real.

        I'm not cherry picking sources, I am telling facts. Internet chat rooms and Infowars are not reliable or credible sources. I use real sources, not anonymous posts on some random chat room.

        Again, all you have is deflect, deflect, deflect! What did Trump do? Hillary! Obama! Hillary!
        lmao. Yet another ko victory for Dr. Cool!

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by man down View Post
          LOL Show me proof Russians did any of this.

          https://www.cnbc.com/video/2018/02/1...-impacted.html
          Deputy AG Rosenstein: No evidence election results were impacted
          All 16 U.S. intelligence agencies have said this. As had the Republican's in the House of Representatives, and the Republican's in the U.S. Senate. Trump and Putin have said they didn't.

          So you believe Putin, a former KGB agent, turned dictator over all Republican's in Congress and all 16 U.S. Intelligence agencies.

          You can read the Mueller indictments from last week, and it shows you how this happened, what Russia did, and how they know it. Same with Republican's in the Senate and Republicans in the House.

          But no, you are probably right, every U.S. intelligence agencies, and Republicans' in Congress are probably all lying and Putin is telling the truth.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
            You have yet to contribute anything more than cheerleading to this thread. As usual you have posted nothing of substance. Just more childish taunts and playing follow the leader while everyone else puts in the work. You can go now.
            As usual you have posted nothing of substance. Again, this entire thread is based on a proven lie. It took all of an hour or two for this statement from Putin to be proven false.



            Sec. of State Hillary Clinton's approval of a deal to transfer control of 20% of U.S. uranium deposits to a Russian company was a quid pro quo exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.

            January 2016: This was on Facebook: "As Secretary of State, Hilary transferred half of U.S. uranium to Russia and received $145 million donation to Clinton Foundation."

            March 2016: This is posted on Facebook. "Secretary of State Hillary Clinton transferred 20% of US uranium to Putin's Russia as 9 investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation." Is this a true fact? Thanks.

            RATING
            False


            https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hi...m-russia-deal/

            It goes into great detail. Including this:

            Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating proposed foreign acquisitions for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can.
            All nine federal agencies were required to approve the Uranium One transaction before it could go forward. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton “never intervened” in committee matters. Clinton herself has said she wasn’t personally involved.



            But again, you have to state a conspiracy theory that has been completely debunked by myriad outlets. Google Hillary Uranium One debunked, and you can pick any source you want. They all say the same thing.

            All you have contributed is a widely debunked conspiracy theory. The rest of us are dealing with facts. Now go back to the chat rooms talking about where Jimmy Hoffa is buried, where Tupac is hiding, and all the bribes Hillary accepted.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Vlad_ View Post
              Even with the recent indictment of the 12 russians, he DOJ stated there is zero evidence that a single vote was affected. Zero.
              You can't prove a vote was affected even if it was. It's impossible.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Dr.Cool View Post
                All 16 U.S. intelligence agencies have said this. As had the Republican's in the House of Representatives, and the Republican's in the U.S. Senate. Trump and Putin have said they didn't.

                So you believe Putin, a former KGB agent, turned dictator over all Republican's in Congress and all 16 U.S. Intelligence agencies.

                You can read the Mueller indictments from last week, and it shows you how this happened, what Russia did, and how they know it. Same with Republican's in the Senate and Republicans in the House.

                But no, you are probably right, every U.S. intelligence agencies, and Republicans' in Congress are probably all lying and Putin is telling the truth.
                Easy killer, I believe 100% they tried to influence our election. The first report said they just wanted to disturb the process and didnt favor anyone. The second one from the other day said they didnt change the outcome.
                BTW Trump has said they did hack
                Trump Says He Now Believes Russia Was Behind Election Hacking
                https://learningenglish.voanews.com/...n/3672516.html

                What do you want him to do? What Obama did?
                https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...-hacking-wont/

                Comment


                • #98
                  Dr.Cool is bringing the heat in this thread.

                  Good stuff backing yourself up with sources vs some of the nonsense being posted.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Dr.Cool View Post
                    No, you can call Senator Portman tomorrow and ask.

                    And again, you have no source. Where is this info from, some chat room???
                    Also the Clinton's were not responsible for the Uranium deal, as has been heavily reported.

                    You can actually call any Senator or Congressman you want. Go ahead and call Senator Portman. Any office. Though, no one ever answers at his D.C. or Toledo office. Toledo office might not be staffed, but the D.C. office just doesn't answer. EVER. But go ahead and call and ask if the pee tape is real.

                    I'm not cherry picking sources, I am telling facts. Internet chat rooms and Infowars are not reliable or credible sources. I use real sources, not anonymous posts on some random chat room.

                    Again, all you have is deflect, deflect, deflect! What did Trump do? Hillary! Obama! Hillary!
                    lmao. Yet another ko victory for Dr. Cool!
                    Originally posted by Dr.Cool View Post
                    As usual you have posted nothing of substance. Again, this entire thread is based on a proven lie. It took all of an hour or two for this statement from Putin to be proven false.



                    Sec. of State Hillary Clinton's approval of a deal to transfer control of 20% of U.S. uranium deposits to a Russian company was a quid pro quo exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.

                    January 2016: This was on Facebook: "As Secretary of State, Hilary transferred half of U.S. uranium to Russia and received $145 million donation to Clinton Foundation."

                    March 2016: This is posted on Facebook. "Secretary of State Hillary Clinton transferred 20% of US uranium to Putin's Russia as 9 investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation." Is this a true fact? Thanks.

                    RATING
                    False


                    https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hi...m-russia-deal/

                    It goes into great detail. Including this:

                    Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating proposed foreign acquisitions for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can.
                    All nine federal agencies were required to approve the Uranium One transaction before it could go forward. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton “never intervened” in committee matters. Clinton herself has said she wasn’t personally involved.



                    But again, you have to state a conspiracy theory that has been completely debunked by myriad outlets. Google Hillary Uranium One debunked, and you can pick any source you want. They all say the same thing.

                    All you have contributed is a widely debunked conspiracy theory. The rest of us are dealing with facts. Now go back to the chat rooms talking about where Jimmy Hoffa is buried, where Tupac is hiding, and all the bribes Hillary accepted.
                    So you believe politicians and their staff members? You are more gullible than I thought. Nothing has been debunked about Clinton Foundation and Uranium or Russia. Those are liberal talking points that are rooted in denial. As are your liberally biased sources like NYT, social media and he long tongued lying devil herself. Keep your head buried in the sand and let the adults talk now.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
                      You can't prove a vote was affected even if it was. It's impossible.
                      The machines cannot be hacked remotely.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP