If all those punches landed on Canelo then he wouldn't make it all the way to the 12th round.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Canelo vs. Golovkin - CompuBox Punch Stats
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Roja's480 View PostI couldn't give the fight to any one of them, GGG was hitting Arms and Air most of the time and Nelo was kicking back on the ropes, and making GGG miss a lot and would counter but go back to kicking back on the ropes not doing much. There was rounds you could give Nelo and some you could give GGG and then some you couldn't decide who won it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by whoelsebutjames View PostCanelo won 1, 2 3, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12 easy
My point was that Golovkin is that Golovkin hung to the jab for the second fight in a row and wouldn't let his hands go.
Golovkin didn't absolutely nothing in round 5 or 6. Please show me footage that says differently
And that is how now we know we can't take any post you make seriously.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
Compubox's amazing accuracy.
Comment
-
Canelo landed the cleaner, harder punches. But if you were rooting for GGG you will dismiss those things and "willfully" not see those punches landing on Canelo's gloves and glancing blows. The guy that moved up in weight was landing more power punches. BUT you guys would have more credibility if in fights before this one you were yelling about compu-box was not credible, then you come back referencing compu-box as the bible. Be consistent with your bs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Damn Wicked View PostWhatever the punch stats say doesn't matter. What does matter is which guy took more punishment in more rounds than his opponent. The fighter who suffered more damage is the loser...Tonight that guy was Canelo. He lost the ****ing fight. This is not ballet.
People need to learn to score more than punches thrown/landed. I say this as a person who saw Golovkin winning.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HURTFEELINGS View PostCanelo landed the cleaner, harder punches. But if you were rooting for GGG you will dismiss those things and "willfully" not see those punches landing on Canelo's gloves and glancing blows. The guy that moved up in weight was landing more power punches. BUT you guys would have more credibility if in fights before this one you were yelling about compu-box was not credible, then you come back referencing compu-box as the bible. Be consistent with your bs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by doom_specialist View PostA winner is actually determined by a fighter winning more 3 minute frames than the other, not how much punishment a guy took. You could deal a guy more punishment in 4 rounds than he could deal you in 8, and still lose a fight. Fighting is a part of boxing, but boxing encompasses much more than "Fighter A hit Fighter B more times so he wins."
People need to learn to score more than punches thrown/landed. I say this as a person who saw Golovkin winning.
Comment
-
Comment