Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

so loooser marquez that was considered to be the worst of the 3 fighting Mexican atg

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • so loooser marquez that was considered to be the worst of the 3 fighting Mexican atg

    is now better than morales and barrera Nsb logic

  • #2
    jmm will never be greater than mab or etem.

    Comment


    • #3
      jmm will cry about being robbed by historians.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by The Problem View Post
        is now better than morales and barrera Nsb logic
        WTF are you even saying here?
        Marquez was blatenly dodged by Barrera, Morales and Hamed who were the biggest names in the division at that time. It wasn't until Barrera had nothing left to lose that he finally fought Marquez.

        Only one who took him on and arguably beat him in his prime was Pacquiao,(2004) and he is an all time great.

        Many of top writers and even former mexican boxers have all said that Marquez was the best of the three fighters.
        Last edited by JJRod; 12-14-2014, 09:52 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by jrrod02 View Post
          WTF are you even saying here?
          Marquez was blatenly dodged by Barrera, Morales and Hamed who were the biggest names in the division at that time. It wasn't until Barrera had nothing left to lose that he finally fought Marquez.

          Only one who took him on and arguably beat him in his prime was Pacquiao,(2004) and he is an all time great.

          Many of top writers and even former mexican boxers have all said that Marquez was the best of the three fighters.
          that's bullcrap spread by hbo to hype up jmm after mab/etem were old.

          jmm turned down a morales fight.

          jmm turned down a hamed fight.

          nacho beristan school of overpricing.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by jrrod02 View Post
            WTF are you even saying here?
            Marquez was blatenly dodged by Barrera, Morales and Hamed who were the biggest names in the division at that time. It wasn't until Barrera had nothing left to lose that he finally fought Marquez.

            Only one who took him on and arguably beat him in his prime was Pacquiao,(2004) and he is an all time great.

            Many of top writers and even former mexican boxers have all said that Marquez was the best of the three fighters.
            I thought barerra beat jmm!

            Comment


            • #7
              barrera fought jmm when he had nothing left to lose. LOL

              barrera was the wbc 130 champ and wanted pac rematch when he fought jmm.

              he was on a 3 year win streak over morales, ayala, peden and rocky juarez. good wins.

              jmm just lost to chris john in indonesia for peanuts the year before.

              so who was desperate? nothing to lose?

              jmm at his prime couldn't handle a past it mab.

              Comment


              • #8
                Barrera and Morales are both better than Marquez.

                Its just Marquez is Pac's Kryptonite

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by KaL-EL View Post
                  Barrera and Morales are both better than Marquez.

                  Its just Marquez is Pac's Kryptonite
                  that and jmm aged better.

                  probably because etem and mab was fighting the best while jmm was a nobody.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by KaL-EL View Post
                    Barrera and Morales are both better than Marquez.

                    Its just Marquez is Pac's Kryptonite
                    JMM is about even with Morales now but Barrera HELL NO he is number 3 on my list

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP