Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If resume matters why is Crawford and others ranked higher than Thurman

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Sheldon312 View Post
    Porter would've destroyed Diaz.
    So what? That's just an opinion because it never happened, and probably wouldn't happen. Hey, I'd welcome Porter to take a fight with Diaz to see how it shakes out, but Porter has the ugliest style to behold, it's a wonder he's got fans like you ready to cup them jewels.

    Comment


    • #42
      I think Crawford is the more well rounded, more skilled. But i think Thurman has got a better resume.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by daggum View Post
        how is it better? crawford beat more top guys across more divisions.
        The stand out names on Crawford's resume are Gamboa and Postol.

        Thurman's stand out names are Porter and Garcia.

        By the eye test, skills, craft, ring generalship yeah Crawford is better. I'm inclined to believe he's better overall and pound 4 pound as well. I believe and have that inclination about him too.

        All I'm saying is that it's a good point. That's all I'm saying.

        I'm not saying Thurman is better or X, Y and Z.

        Just saying TS brings up a good point.

        Tranquilo guys, Tranquilo
        Last edited by The Time; 05-23-2017, 10:04 AM.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Sheldon312 View Post
          Porter would've destroyed Diaz.
          You really did not respond to the question. I wonder what Crawford would've done to a fock like Bundu.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by KingHippo View Post
            You really did not respond to the question. I wonder what Crawford would've done to a fock like Bundu.
            What was the question again.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Sheldon312 View Post
              What was the question again.
              When was the last time Thurman toyed with a credible opponent?

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by KingHippo View Post
                When was the last time Thurman toyed with a credible opponent?
                Doesnt matter Porter and Garcia are better than Postol, Gamboa, and Diaz.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Sheldon312 View Post
                  Doesnt matter Porter and Garcia are better than Postol, Gamboa, and Diaz.
                  There are no universe where Garcia is better than Postol. For one, Garcia didn't want anything to do with him when he was a jr welterweight, and 2 they both have a common opponent. Garcia went life and death with him and Postol put on a clinic. As for Porter, he isn't proven at all, and again, Thurman barely got through him.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP