OFFICIAL: Donald Trump thread.

[Sugar Adam Ali]

You can't be serious? Iran wasn't a problem? Iran was behind the civil war in Iraq, which Bush started. And Iran doesn't have nukes. What are you talking about?

The IAEA was kicked out of N. Korea while Bush was in office. N. Korea was cooperative until Bush put them on that Axis of Evil list. Bush started talking tough so N. Korea were determined to obtain nukes for defensive purposes. It was verified in 2003 that N. Korea had nukes.

Rewind to 2007 and then flash forward to now.

N. Korea, Iran, Isis- were they bigger threats in 2007 then they are in 2017?

[Motorcity Cobra]

Rewind to 2007 and then flash forward to now.

N. Korea, Iran, Isis- were they bigger threats in 2007 then they are in 2017?

Iran is neutralized. Their nuclear weapons program is stopped. Their nuclear weapons program grew under Bush and stopped under Obama. It's cool to have an opinion but your opinion doesn't negate the facts.

N. Korea was contained until Bush put them on the Axis of Evil list and started acting hostile towards them. There were UN inspections in N. Korea before then. They kicked them out when Bush was in office. That's when their nuclear weapons program became a reality.

No, Isis wasn't a threat under Bush. There was no Isis. Al Queda was a threat under Bush and they were far more effective and dangerous than Isis has ever been.

To be honest with you all these so called terrorist groups are created by our intelligence agencies. We're funding them one minute and the next we're fighting them.

[Sugar Adam Ali]

Iran is neutralized. Their nuclear weapons program is stopped. Their nuclear weapons program grew under Bush and stopped under Obama. It's cool to have an opinion but your opinion doesn't negate the facts.

N. Korea was contained until Bush put them on the Axis of Evil list and started acting hostile towards them. There were UN inspections in N. Korea before then. They kicked them out when Bush was in office. That's when their nuclear weapons program became a reality.

No, Isis wasn't a threat under Bush. There was no Isis. Al Queda was a threat under Bush and they were far more effective and dangerous than Isis has ever been.

To be honest with you all these so called terrorist groups are created by our intelligence agencies. We're funding them one minute and the next we're fighting them.

Bigger threat in 2007 or 2017?

Which is it

[Motorcity Cobra]

Bigger threat in 2007 or 2017?

Which is it

2007. They had Iraq in a civil war and most of the middle east destabilized. Remember the Arab Spring? The invasion of Iraq is what made Iran a power in the region. They were on their way to acquiring nuclear weapons. Now their nuke program is neutralized. If Trump doesn't renew this accord with Iran you'll once again see them restart their nuke weapons program. As of now they're complying. Even Gen. Matthis said they're complying.

[Sugar Adam Ali]

2007. They had Iraq in a civil war and most of the middle east destabilized. Remember the Arab Spring? The invasion of Iraq is what made Iran a power in the region. They were on their way to acquiring nuclear weapons. Now their nuke program is neutralized. If Trump doesn't renew this accord with Iran you'll once again see them restart their nuke weapons program. As of now they're complying. Even Gen. Matthis said they're complying.

Lmao,,, whatever dude..

I don't see how anyone can think that Iran, isis, and North Korea are now much safer and not as dangerous as they are in 2017

[Motorcity Cobra]

Lmao,,, whatever dude..

I don't see how anyone can think that Iran, isis, and North Korea are now much safer and not as dangerous as they are in 2017

In 2007 they had a nuclear program and were on the verge of obtaining nuclear weapons

In 2017 their nuclear program is neutralized.

You said in your earlier post that Iran had nukes. You didn't even know they didn't have nukes Cmon man. Get serious. Stop thinking with emotions.

[1bad65]

Lmao,,, whatever dude..

I don't see how anyone can think that Iran, isis, and North Korea are now much safer and not as dangerous as they are in 2017

It's called being a superfan.

[Hype job]

Please, stop using big words you don't understand.
If you need me to explain the word to you, please ask. I'm always up for giving free lessons, and it's pleasing to me to see folks learn new things.

I did not resort to conjecture. You're now illustrating Dunning-Kruger effect to boot.

Please, stop digging.

If you're going to act like a ******ed broken record and keep mindlessly repeating yourself, I'll be forced to put you on Ignore to avoid dealing with your childish nonsense.

So please, try again. And don't use big words you don't understand.

1. 'Conjecture' isn't a big word.

2. Definition of conjecture:

noun
1.
the formation or expression of an opinion or theory without sufficient evidence for proof.
2.
an opinion or theory so formed or expressed; guess; speculation.

b :supposition
2 a :inference formed without proof or sufficient evidence
b :a conclusion deduced by surmise or guesswork The criminal's motive remains a matter of conjecture.

You provided no proof that Venezuela's current situation can be attributed to socialism, so I'll take your opinion as conjecture.

Unless you don't understand the word yourself?

[1bad65]

1. 'Conjecture' isn't a big word.

2. Definition of conjecture:



You provided no proof that Venezuela's current situation can be attributed to socialism, so I'll take your opinion as conjecture.

Unless you don't understand the word yourself?

I explained how it was a simple case of Cause and Effect using irrefutable facts.

You're very close to going on Ignore for attrition tactics by doing the broken record routine.

But for now I'll play along.

Venezuela didn't have shortages under a free market system but had massive shortages after moving to a socialist system. You claim them moving to socialism wasn't the cause of the shortages.

What do you say was the cause of their shortages after they moved to a socialist system if it wasn't their moving to said socialist system that was the cause?

[BrometheusBob.]

The economy lost 33,000 jobs last month, the first monthly decline in employment in seven years. Wall Street economists had expected very modest employment gains of 80,000, according to Bloomberg.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/06/b...mployment.html

So tired of winning