Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why are Brittish PPV #'s being counted or even mentioned in regards to Hatton?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why are Brittish PPV #'s being counted or even mentioned in regards to Hatton?

    When debating this whole purse share situation? Those numbers are irrelevant as only one party is gets a percentage from them which is Hatton is that not right?

    Hatton's only had 1 PPV event in the United States against someone who already was a draw. His fight with Malignaggi garnered low ratings. Its not even a question who deserves the bigger purse.

  • #2
    that makes a difference in hatton wonderland

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by 2501 View Post
      When debating this whole purse share situation? Those numbers are irrelevant as only one party is gets a percentage from them which is Hatton is that not right?

      Hatton's only had 1 PPV event in the United States against someone who already was a draw. His fight with Malignaggi garnered low ratings. Its not even a question who deserves the bigger purse.
      the UK ppv revenue is shared between the fighters.

      hatton sold 1.3 M PPVS in the uk for his fight with mayweather at 5 am local time.

      thats crazy, not to mention the majority of the fans in the arena were hattons'. hatton deserves at least equal purse

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by 2501 View Post
        When debating this whole purse share situation? Those numbers are irrelevant as only one party is gets a percentage from them which is Hatton is that not right?

        Hatton's only had 1 PPV event in the United States against someone who already was a draw. His fight with Malignaggi garnered low ratings. Its not even a question who deserves the bigger purse.
        Pacquaio was going to get 50% of the British PPV. Even though Hatton is the main draw.

        Thus 50-50 is very fair on Pacquaio.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by 2501 View Post
          When debating this whole purse share situation? Those numbers are irrelevant as only one party is gets a percentage from them which is Hatton is that not right?

          Hatton's only had 1 PPV event in the United States against someone who already was a draw. His fight with Malignaggi garnered low ratings. Its not even a question who deserves the bigger purse.
          the original offer was 60-40 for pac in the u.s. , pac keeps philippine tv money and hatton keeps british ppv money.

          arum wasn't gonna fall for that that's why he asked for 50-50 for both u.s. and u.k. money.

          hatton then gave in.

          with 50-50 of u.s. and u.k. money and manny with exclusivity on philippine money......manny gets more.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by 2501 View Post
            Those numbers are irrelevant as only one party is gets a percentage from them which is Hatton is that not right?
            That's not right.

            Get your ****ing facts right before posting biased ass ****.


            Both fighters recieve equal revenue from the British PPV's


            Now **** off

            Comment


            • #7
              manny is definitely being a ***** about this, not even a fight with floyd could get him more money.

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP