Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

if we all want to be honest, Wilder Ducked Joshua. But..

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Froch_uppercut View Post
    I agree that Hearn has to give a decent slice to DW, but Wilder just doesn’t sell, even in his own country. This surely has to be considered when deciding what’s fair. Wilder keeps saying he’s worth a chop 50/50. C’mon, he’s dreaming.
    60-40 for Joshua in the UK is legit. If it's Vegas then it should be 50-50

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Froch_uppercut View Post
      You don’t do biz over social media, and nobody is going to agree to a deal without seeing the terms and conditions.
      Wilder's offer was made via email and sent to Joshua, his promoter, his manager and his trainer. Had nothing to do with social media. Terms and conditions were included. Joshua was asked to confirm that 50 million would be acceptable, pending finer details, so they could meet to hammer out the finer details.

      Joshua turned down the 50 million, so there was no reason to meet about finer details.


      It was a pr stunt. Wilder knows he’s beaten. He’ll go back to fighting the likes of Brazeale, or move to cruiser, but he wants no part of AJ
      Joshua and Hearn both publicly admitted the offer was real, but that they preferred to take less money to fight at home.

      Wilder's last two opponents are currently rated #3 and #7 in Boxrec. Joshua's last two opponents are currently rated #4 and #10 in Boxrec. Seems like an odd criticism to insist Wilder will "go back" to fighting the Breazeale's of the world, when nobody at heavyweight is facing stiffer competition than he is right now.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
        Wilder's offer was made via email and sent to Joshua, his promoter, his manager and his trainer. Had nothing to do with social media. Terms and conditions were included. Joshua was asked to confirm that 50 million would be acceptable, pending finer details, so they could meet to hammer out the finer details.

        Joshua turned down the 50 million, so there was no reason to meet about finer details.




        Joshua and Hearn both publicly admitted the offer was real, but that they preferred to take less money to fight at home.

        Wilder's last two opponents are currently rated #3 and #7 in Boxrec. Joshua's last two opponents are currently rated #4 and #10 in Boxrec. Seems like an odd criticism to insist Wilder will "go back" to fighting the Breazeale's of the world, when nobody at heavyweight is facing stiffer competition than he is right now.
        Wilder just lost to his last opponent in the opinion of 90% of people.

        Fury confirmed there was a 2 way rematch clause too. They had no intention of fighting Joshua in April. But they didn't tell you that did they **** gobbler.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
          Wilder just lost to his last opponent in the opinion of 90% of people.
          Not even close. About 40% of ringside experts had Fury winning, about 40% had a draw, and about 20% had Wilder winning.

          BoxingScene compiled 14 expert opinions as well, and the percentages were consistent with the ringside experts.

          https://www.boxingscene.com/deontay-...coring--134267

          Total: 6 for Tyson fury, 3 for Deontay Wilder, 5 even.


          Fury confirmed there was a 2 way rematch clause too. They had no intention of fighting Joshua in April. But they didn't tell you that did they **** gobbler.
          I was the first one to report there was a two way rematch clause.

          But not every rematch clause is the same. Often times, in the event of a draw, the two way rematch clause is null and void. Often times, the champion is entitled to an immediate rematch, while the challenger gets their rematch after an intervening fight.

          Comment

          Working...
          X
          TOP